I'm a huge proponent of opensource. I use it in my personal life and also corporate use. I strongly try to advocate that we contribute something back at a corporate level for our usage of opensource software.
Intrinsically I see giving back to the OpenSource communities around whom we benefit from their work, as just making good business sense. Kind of like the insurance company model, if more companies contributed time, money or both then we would de-risk software going unsupported, or worse yet being a pillar piece of a Fortune 500 company that provides core services to millions of people worldwide where that service goes out of service e.g. pgBackRest for PostGreSQL....
With that being said, if companies are not willing to contribute said time or money, I'd at least expect them to respect the licensing terms of these projects.
I've recently discovered a new AI company called malus https://malus.sh/ that is doing what I can only call brazenly ripping off the open source community and advertising it as a good thing - using AI agents to recreate existing AGPL and opensource software from scratch to avoid licensing the software or the terms and conditions. This will only hurt opensource and really bugs me. I wonder how big tech would respond if malus was to point their tooling at MS Office or instagram etc....
@Cliff : with your legal background is this simply new ground that we are in, or in your opinion is there any legal recourse?
Intrinsically I see giving back to the OpenSource communities around whom we benefit from their work, as just making good business sense. Kind of like the insurance company model, if more companies contributed time, money or both then we would de-risk software going unsupported, or worse yet being a pillar piece of a Fortune 500 company that provides core services to millions of people worldwide where that service goes out of service e.g. pgBackRest for PostGreSQL....
With that being said, if companies are not willing to contribute said time or money, I'd at least expect them to respect the licensing terms of these projects.
I've recently discovered a new AI company called malus https://malus.sh/ that is doing what I can only call brazenly ripping off the open source community and advertising it as a good thing - using AI agents to recreate existing AGPL and opensource software from scratch to avoid licensing the software or the terms and conditions. This will only hurt opensource and really bugs me. I wonder how big tech would respond if malus was to point their tooling at MS Office or instagram etc....
@Cliff : with your legal background is this simply new ground that we are in, or in your opinion is there any legal recourse?