Yoused
up

Russian soldiers blow themselves up after getting drunk on resupply run
The men were reportedly tasked with buying military equipment and they had been drinking at the time of the deadly explosion.

![]()
Russian soldiers blow themselves up after getting drunk on resupply run
The men were reportedly tasked with buying military equipment and they had been drinking at the time of the deadly explosion.www.newsweek.com
If this is true, infuriating and incomprehensible. Obviously we aren’t party to all the information administration officials have access to nor the basis of their discussions, but from the outside it’s hard to justify:
View attachment 26031
I’ve seen a lot of people dismiss those arguments. Somebody on Twitter crunched the numbers and we have the capacity to give the Ukrainians a couple hundred ATACMS regardless of PrSM which itself wont really be available in any significant quantities anytime soon. Now I can’t speak to that personally but certainly no one buys the escalation argument anymore, not with StormShadow and ScalpER in theater.There are reasons and more to the story.
![]()
Decision To Give ATACMS To Ukraine Is About To Become Easier
With ATACMS' replacement arriving very soon, one major argument against sending the ballistic missiles to Ukraine would lose its potency.www.thedrive.com
I’ve seen a lot of people dismiss those arguments. Somebody on Twitter crunched the numbers and we have the capacity to give the Ukrainians a couple hundred ATACMS regardless of PrSM which itself wont really be available in any significant quantities anytime soon. Now I can’t speak to that personally but certainly no one buys the escalation argument anymore, not with StormShadow and ScalpER in theater.
View attachment 26033
The below is an extremely long thread detailing not only the use of ATACMS but its availability:
I’ve not see any one take issue with the analysis presented. But I’m hardly an expert on munitions and their production.
Almost everyone I read on this subject appears to be flabbergasted by the decision making or lack thereof. Some I think are reading too … darkly into it, but even I am at loss as to what the thinking is if the above is accurate.
Multiple journalists who cover defense and former government types seem to believe both the guys I quoted are very reliable in terms of their expertise on this subject. That doesn’t make them necessarily right of course. I get that. But it is frustrating because the administration isn’t really saying why officially - it’s all back channel to reporters with different anonymous sources saying sometimes subtly sometimes wildly different things.That's just it. We're not in a position to accurately assess/evaluate arguments made by social media "experts." If they have/had expertise in that field and demonstrable inside knowledge, well, maybe.
It *feels* (for what it's worth) legit to me at the moment. So I'm leaning that way.
Multiple journalists who cover defense and former government types seem to believe both the guys I quoted are very reliable in terms of their expertise on this subject. That doesn’t make them necessarily right of course. I get that. But it is frustrating because the administration isn’t really saying why officially - it’s all back channel to reporters with different anonymous sources saying sometimes subtly sometimes wildly different things.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.