The Fall of Intel

[throAU]

would also be the end of Intel. Their strength was never design.

Much like microsoft, their true strength has been strong-arming OEMs.

Intel could completely die along with their architecture and i'd be 100% fine with this.

 

[Yoused]

would also be the end of Intel

What would happen to their IP? Mostly I mean the standards like PCI and USB, that everyone uses.

 

[Cmaier]

What would happen to their IP? Mostly I mean the standards like PCI and USB, that everyone uses.

Dunno. Not saying they’ll go out of business. Even IBM still exists. Just nobody cares. Also, keep in mind that a lot of that IP is expired - patents last 20 years, for instance.

 

[dada_dave]

There is an emergency board meeting to discuss further cuts. However, now reports are that Intel is not currently entertaining selling off its foundry business but proposing to sell off Altera and withdrawing from big capital investments:

Intel CEO will reportedly present plans to cut assets at an emergency board meeting — chipmaker may put $32B Magdeburg plant on hold and sell off Altera

Pat Gelsinger's Intel woes continue.

www.tomshardware.com

 

[Cmaier]

There is an emergency board meeting to discuss further cuts. However, now reports are that Intel is not currently entertaining selling off its foundry business but proposing to sell off Altera and withdrawing from big capital investments:

Intel CEO will reportedly present plans to cut assets at an emergency board meeting — chipmaker may put $32B Magdeburg plant on hold and sell off Altera

Pat Gelsinger's Intel woes continue.

www.tomshardware.com

Didn’t they just buy altera? LOL.

 

[dada_dave]

Didn’t they just buy altera? LOL.

It feels that way but it was 2015 which horrifyingly was already 9 years ago. I suppose it depends on how recent you feel that is.

 

[Cmaier]

It feels that way but it was 2015 which horrifyingly was already 9 years ago. I suppose it depends on how recent you feel that is.

Yikes! I really thought it was much more recent. Time flies.

 

[dada_dave]

Intel could be removed from Dow Jones due to stark stock price drop: Report

Nvidia or Texas Instruments could replace Intel in the DJIA index.

www.tomshardware.com

Intel is now facing possible removal from the index due to a severe drop in its stock price this year, says analysts and investors in a Reuters report.

 

[Cmaier]

Intel’s next-gen chip manufacturing process reportedly hits snag after failing crucial tests

Intel’s next-gen chip manufacturing process hits snag after reportedly failing crucial tests. Broadcom found that the technique isn’t quite ready for high-volume production.

www.engadget.com

Bad yields?

 

[Yoused]

Bad yields?

Your link: "“Intel 18A is powered on, healthy and yielding well, and we remain fully on track to begin high volume manufacturing next year,” a spokesperson told Reuters"

Perhaps a more fundamental issue? Lunar Lake will be on TSMC N3B.

ETA, the -A processes are supposed to have backside power delivery, "RibbonFET" (one more name for GAAFET) and fancy-ass transistor stacking. It sounds to me as though Intel was reaching hard to implement all the new features at once and either came up short or had inadequate cell libraries.

 

[Cmaier]

Your link: "“Intel 18A is powered on, healthy and yielding well, and we remain fully on track to begin high volume manufacturing next year,” a spokesperson told Reuters"

Perhaps a more fundamental issue? Lunar Lake will be on TSMC N3B.

ETA, the -A processes are supposed to have backside power delivery, "RibbonFET" (one more name for GAAFET) and fancy-ass transistor stacking. It sounds to me as though Intel was reaching hard to implement all the new features at once and either came up short or had inadequate cell libraries.

well, intel says that yield is good, which is exactly what they would say if broadcom says yield is bad.

 

[Yoused]

what they would say if broadcom says yield is bad

Except, it was not reported that Broadcom said that. The article says that Broadcom was disappointed with the results. Which might mean poor yields, or it could mean that the performance of the final working product is not up to what they were expecting.

 

[Cmaier]

Except, it was not reported that Broadcom said that. The article says that Broadcom was disappointed with the results. Which might mean poor yields, or it could mean that the performance of the final working product is not up to what they were expecting.

I don’t understand that. Performance is part of yield. Poor yield doesn’t always necessarily mean “too many chips are broken.” It often means “only 5% of the chips meet the targeted speed.”

Additionally, it is almost never the case that a rocket lot comes back and there is a performance problem and the performance problem is caused by process. It’s almost always a design error. This is because long before you send real payloads through, you send ring oscillators and other test circuits through, so the performance is pretty well understood and characterized early on.

I’d bet the farm the problem is yield, and that the yield problem is mostly functional.

 

[dada_dave]

Except, it was not reported that Broadcom said that. The article says that Broadcom was disappointed with the results. Which might mean poor yields, or it could mean that the performance of the final working product is not up to what they were expecting.

I don’t understand that. Performance is part of yield. Poor yield doesn’t always necessarily mean “too many chips are broken.” It often means “only 5% of the chips meet the targeted speed.”

Additionally, it is almost never the case that a rocket lot comes back and there is a performance problem and the performance problem is caused by process. It’s almost always a design error. This is because long before you send real payloads through, you send ring oscillators and other test circuits through, so the performance is pretty well understood and characterized early on.

I’d bet the farm the problem is yield, and that the yield problem is mostly functional.

Arrow Lake now to be manufactured on TSMC rather than Intel's internal 20A node, link for the article says its 18A that is scrapped but article itself says that Intel has scrapped 20A which, that 20A was only ever to be a short lived node anyway, that scraping it was probably due to cost cutting measures of not bringing the node fully online (but now they have to pay TSMC for the privilege of manufacturing their dies), and that Intel claims they took everything they needed to know from developing it to make 18A, which is the going to be the main one for themselves and their foundry customers, successful:

Intel announces cancellation of 20A process node for Arrow Lake, goes with external nodes instead, likely TSMC

Out with the Intel node, in with TSMC.

www.tomshardware.com

So, in combination with the leak that Broadcom is unhappy with 18A (20A sibling node similar to N3E and N3B as in same family but different cell libraries), make of that what you will ... maybe they're unrelated, but maybe they are ...

 

[dada_dave]

So this seems incredibly unlikely to be accepted and even the report says there isn’t an actual offer, but the fact that Qualcomm is reportedly even considering making an offer is amazing:

Qualcomm reportedly explores buying portions of Intel's PC client business

Qualcomm could be Intel's way out of its financial problems.

www.tomshardware.com

[Qualcomm is exploring] the buyout of Intel's client PC design division, which develops chips for laptops and desktops. This unit has caught Qualcomm's attention as Intel faces difficulties maintaining its cash flow and shedding assets.