USAID has been used as cover for covert operations for decades.
Remember the DNA collection that was done under the guise of a vaccination program in Afghanistan/Pakistan to try to find OBL? That was openly reported in western media.
Any country that has been in hostile relations with the US has every right to not trust the spook filled “NGO’s” offering help. History has shown time and again that we use legitimate aid as a Trojan horse to carry out covert ops.
USAID also delivers food to hungry people. What is your point in pursuing the seamy side of international politics of self-interest right now in a thread about recovery from a couple of 7+ earthquakes in Turkey and Syria?
Start a new thread if you want to allege that the bad ol' USA is somehow unique in its covert use of well-meaning aid and maybe after some edits and redactions here and there, you could sell it as a screenplay; I mean there's always room for another remake of "The Quiet American" -- and certainly since Vietnam in the 1950s there have been plenty of both time and venues for the USA and other players on the world stage to slip some under-radar and self-interested government efforts into those high profile deliveries of humanitarian relief to the site of yet another natural disaster or ruinous war.
More to the point of the current recovery efforts, do you really think that a person in Syria or Turkey whose relatives are being dug out (dead or alive) from a collapsed building this week, or who is receiving food aid or blankets against the winter, give a damn if the sender of the assistance has ulterior political motives?
The victims of that quake did not set out in the predawn hours a few days ago to stage an event that would lend either their own or another government a fat chance to "get over" on anyone during a distraction. They woke up in rubble, or died, or now stand outside tombs of freezing kin and hope there will be someplace to get warmth and food. The world is responding with assistance, and that includes the USA. In times of fundamental distress, a human being does not look a gift horse in the mouth, nor care if the giver is keeping a scorecard on some other level of concern. Sure, that affords room for fat cats and power brokers and clandestine programs to abuse the situation for personal or political gain. Shall we just not send the aid because some of us are aware that mischief could be afoot under guise of generosity?
We didn't NOT send the aid that we said we would, and that I mentioned in my earlier post. The stuff from the DART response is already on the ground in Turkey and now we're working to extend that via USAID to both countries.
Also, individual Americans are among the most generous in making donations to the NGOs that reliably show up to help. We can't personally open a storefront food pantry as an alternative gesture and ensure personally in that way that our aid is "genuine." We pay taxes and some of our money goes to humanitarian relief. If we suspect that such aid is sometimes accompanied by an agent of the government whose interest is other than humanitarian, our recourse is to challenge that alleged behavior by picking up the phone and complaining to a congressman or a journalist.
In the meantime I doubt very much that most Americans would want us to stand out as a developed nation sitting on its hands watching other countries chip in to recovery from a natural disaster just because it's possible for any government to try to use the effort additionally for covert purposes.