Pillowturd news

[Cmaier]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mnd.203171/gov.uscourts.mnd.203171.1.0.pdf

Alan Dershowitz one of the attorneys. LOL.

 

[fooferdoggie]

seems he is sharing trumps lawyers. they just don't get it you cant sue to get your shit back when seized.

 

[GermanSuplex]

seems he is sharing trumps lawyers. they just don't get it you cant sue to get your shit back when seized.

Unless you're Trump, it seems.

I'm glad the judge serving as special master is asking the obvious and pertinent questions, but it really shouldn't have gotten to this point.

That said, Lindell and those around Trump don't have the influence or money that Trump does. Trump is also in control of a large donation pool to pay his bills with. All these other creeps latching onto Trump and getting themselves in trouble? Not so much.

 

[Cmaier]

https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1573021653868908544/

 

[GermanSuplex]

https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1573021653868908544/

GOOD.

This is why precedent matters, and Judge Cannon's ruling was so terrible. It sets a precedent future cons, crooks and thieves can cite. Likewise, the appeals court ruling sets a precedent - "This bullshit won't fly here. Take this argument back to Truth Social, it has no standing in a court of law."

 

[Cmaier]

GOOD.

This is why precedent matters, and Judge Cannon's ruling was so terrible. It sets a precedent future cons, crooks and thieves can cite. Likewise, the appeals court ruling sets a precedent - "This bullshit won't fly here. Take this argument back to Truth Social, it has no standing in a court of law."

Luckily, given that she is a district court judge, her rulings don’t set precedent anywhere other than the district she’s in. Luckily, since the 11th circuit is a circuit court, its rulings set precedent for an entire circuit.

 

[lizkat]

seems he is sharing trumps lawyers. they just don't get it you cant sue to get your shit back when seized.

There's a lot of stuff they don't seem to get. It's like when Trump was absurdly whining that criminal charges might be brought against him if he didn't get to go through the papers in question first. The 11th circuit ruling granting the stay to the DoJ reminded us that woeful as it may seem, under rule of law an innocent person may have to endure being charged with a crime.

... we find unpersuasive Plaintiff’s insistence that he would be harmed by a criminal investigation. “Bearing the discomfiture and cost of a prosecution for crime even by an innocent person is one of the painful obligations of citizenship.” Cobbledick v. United States, 309 U.S. 323, 325 (1940).