Jimmyjames
Elite Member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2022
- Posts
- 1,239
How can I put this politely…he’s not the best. I have no idea how he got so many subs.Why does he keep saying the M4 Max GPU has 20 cores? It’s 40-cores …
How can I put this politely…he’s not the best. I have no idea how he got so many subs.Why does he keep saying the M4 Max GPU has 20 cores? It’s 40-cores …
Oh you know I think I've seen him before, yeah I wasn't impressed then either. And not only so many subs but UL sending him a beta for a new (to macOS) benchmark ...How can I put this politely…he’s not the best. I have no idea how he got so many subs.
Kind of infuriating.Oh you know I think I've seen him before, yeah I wasn't impressed then either. And not only so many subs but UL sending him a beta for a new (to macOS) benchmark ...
Being big on a platform like YouTube is less about your technical knowledge and accuracy and more about your presentation style and camera-personality. The very biggest channels are often less knowledgable and accurate than the ones a few ticks smallerKind of infuriating.
True but even knowing that I wasn’t really impressed.Being big on a platform like YouTube is less about your technical knowledge and accuracy and more about your presentation style and camera-personality. The very biggest channels are often less knowledgable and accurate than the ones a few ticks smaller
It appears that the full version of Steel Nomad will be released for macOS soon. Here is a pre-release score from this video. Around RTX 3070 level.
View attachment 34406
It’s just steel nomad. The other tests are considered old/out of date I believe.Steel Nomad and Steel Nomad light is the same test at different resolutions.
It looks like 3dmark is making a macOS launcher for the existing tests. It doesn't seem like they are going to bring over the existing feature tests. Someone said they were working on a new mobile RT test, though they would probably be better served just bringing Port Royal or Speedway over.
Speedway "just" came out as the replacement for Port Royal. The only thing it is missing is a path traced feature test. With DXR 1.2 being announced/released I suppose they are going to make a new RT test to take advantage of it. I presume Metal already has the same feature set?It’s just steel nomad. The other tests are considered old/out of date I believe.
By other tests, I meant Time Spy etc. Speedway is a DirectX specific benchmark afaik.Speedway "just" came out as the replacement for Port Royal. The only thing it is missing is a path traced feature test. With DXR 1.2 being announced/released I suppose they are going to make a new RT test to take advantage of it. I presume Metal already has the same feature set?
Yup. They will have to come up with something for a better RT test than Solar Bay.By other tests, I meant Time Spy etc. Speedway is a DirectX specific benchmark afaik.
I see what you mean:I’m seeing some people (not here) being surprised by the delta between the M4 Max and the 5090. I think it’s to be expected given the delta in compute and power between the two.
Oh no.I see what you mean:
![]()
Apple is falling behind, M4 Max nowhere close to RTX 5090.
When the M1 Max launched, Apple said that it rivaled the flagship NVIDIA GPU at the time, the RTX 3080. However, in 2025, when comparing the M4 Max MacBook Pro to PC laptops equipped with the flagship NVIDIA GPU, the RTX 5090, which costs the same as a M4 Max MacBook Pro, the MacBook Pro gets...forums.macrumors.com
![]()
It appears that the full version of Steel Nomad will be released for macOS soon. Here is a pre-release score from this video. Around RTX 3070 level.
View attachment 34406
I honestly have no idea how well optimized 3DMark’s benchmarks are for macOS. I suspect not very well optimized. but I have nothing to back that up.Interestingly Notebookcheck has the 5060 Ti scoring 15%-20% better than the M4 Max's Steel Nomad score, but the reverse is true in Blender:
![]()
Blender - Open Data
Blender Open Data is a platform to collect, display and query the results of hardware and software performance tests - provided by the public.opendata.blender.org
The size of the 5060 Ti GPU should be similar, in fact smaller than a M4 Max:
![]()
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Specs
NVIDIA GB206, 2572 MHz, 4608 Cores, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 8192 MB GDDR7, 1750 MHz, 128 bitwww.techpowerup.com
(technically the TFLOPs of the 5060 Ti are higher, but as discussed previously actual performance is closer to TFLOPs/2*1.3)
This discrepancy between the results could be a function of multiple (non-mutually exclusive) things: 1) the Steel Nomad Mac benchmark is in beta, it's possibly still be worked on. 2) The 5060 Ti's drivers aren't set and for whatever reason Blender suffers worse. 3) Blender has ray tracing while SN is pure raster. 4) The SN engine is just better suited to Nvidia hardware for some reason. Given the size of the two GPUs the Blender results make slightly more sense.
Macs and iPhones generally perform really well in the older Wild Life Extreme and okay in SNL if I remember right. But this result is definitely odd.I honestly have no idea how well optimized 3DMark’s benchmarks are for macOS. I suspect not very well optimized. but I have nothing to back that up.
I was under the impression UL writes the bench to an API, and don't include vendor specific paths.I honestly have no idea how well optimized 3DMark’s benchmarks are for macOS. I suspect not very well optimized. but I have nothing to back that up.
I am sure that’s true. But even writing general DirectX or Metal or whatever code there’s still usage patterns that are more or less friendly to a given micro architectureI was under the impression UL writes the bench to an API, and don't include vendor specific paths.
I wonder why I cannot find any vulkan scores for the 5060ti in Steel Nomad (Light as well).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.