- Joined
- Sep 26, 2021
- Posts
- 6,571
- Main Camera
- Sony
Not sure what this one is about, exactly - I don’t have time to look at the docket and read the motions, but it looks like maybe an expert, in his reply report, exceeded the scope of the opposition he was supposed to be responding to, or relied on undisclosed evidence or something.
12/14/2021 - 10:00AM | 4:11-cv-06714-YGR - In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation CLERKS NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING FOR THE Motion to Strike or Exclude Reply Testimony of Professor Daniel L. McFadden Hearing [578] set for Tuesday, 12/14/2021 10:00 AM via Zoom Webinar Videoconference before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ygr General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots orother visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited. Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2021 10:00 AM via Zoom Webinar Videoconference Only before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. (Related documents(s) [578]) |