I like random stuff...


My friend took me to a theme-ish restaurant (you may have heard of the chain) which was playing down-home-ish music, and let me tell you, as good as that song is (and no, that is not Clooney singing), hearing it five times in two hours is all kinds of wrong.
 
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1502901079268372483/
Not only is the reindeer's eye beautiful, it is a scientific marvel. The animal's eyes change from a golden colour to a deep blue as summer fades to winter, helping it to see in dramatically different light levels.

What is happening?​

The part that changes colour is called the tapetum lucidum. It is a shiny, mirrored layer behind the retina that helps some animals to see in the dark.
When light enters the eye much of it hits the sensitive cells in the retina. But sometimes it misses the mark. The tapetum lucidum gives the eye a second chance to detect the light by reflecting it back towards the retina again.
It is the reason some mammals, including cats, have eyes that seem to glow when light is shined on them.
In many animals this reflective layer shines gold, permanently. While reindeer eyes are also gold in the summer months, in winter their layer turns blue.

Why the colour change?​

Scientists think the blue colour helps to capture even more light. Animals that live in the Arctic experience dramatic changes in light levels, with long hours of bright light in the summer and almost total darkness in winter.
One theory is that in the winter, pressure inside the animal's eye builds due to the effort of keeping the pupils dilated and large for months on end.
The pressure squeezes fluid out of the tapetum lucidum, which is formed mostly of collagen fibres. As result, the fibres pack together more tightly and start to reflect blue wavelengths of light instead of yellow.
The blue eyes become over a thousand times more sensitive to light than the yellow summer ones, making reindeer vision perfectly adapted to its unforgiving habitat.
 
I like the boldness of the idea. Just have no confidence that it would be inclusive and not cost (certain) taxpayers in the long run.
If you check out a very long video I posted elsewhere, you could be confident.

Because the wealthiest would be benefit from the breaks & loopholes they would use to make even more exclusive properties, by having to fund other more affordable areas as far away from them as possible.

Basically NYC has for awhile traded in giving very large breaks to the few, IF they are willing to show small benefits to the rest.

Would it really be "inclusive"? Yeah, for a wealthy few. But it would have some areas probably that are "affordable". For those areas would be what attract people to spend & maintain that area. The question of course is, what is "affordable"? We've been looking at a YouTube series called "Listed", that's basically about the homes & apartments of influencers. Their places are far too expensive for people who "work" for a living ( one woman actually just lives in the rent controlled apartment she was raised in, and her parents retired elsewhere ), but are the aspirational places that make NYC seem attractive. I assume it would be that sort who live in the "affordable" housing, to make that area attractive, and thus worth more to the wealthiest who would inevitably exploit it before moving on.
 
If you check out a very long video I posted elsewhere, you could be confident.

Because the wealthiest would be benefit from the breaks & loopholes they would use to make even more exclusive properties, by having to fund other more affordable areas as far away from them as possible.

Basically NYC has for awhile traded in giving very large breaks to the few, IF they are willing to show small benefits to the rest.
I watched the subsequent video and that is what immediately came to my mind when I wrote that statement about inclusive, affordable housing. I have no confidence that it would be. From locating a pittance of "affordable housing" several miles away, poor doors that separate the few members of the working class from the wealthy, and just the shitty tax loopholes/abatements that allow the super rich to skirt paying their fair of taxes, this would never be fair in any sense of the word. I'd much rather them just build sea walls, dikes, whatever to protect against climate changes that will devastate the City soon-ish.
 
Happy Pi Day #1 (3/14); the other is on 7/22 (22/7 is also pi).

Pi Day, yes! Endless fun...

pi eating contest.jpg
 
Back
Top