SuperMatt
Site Master
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2020
- Posts
- 7,862
- Solutions
- 1
Or the biggest mark against her if you’re a Republican. They already tried the “did you defend the terrorists at Guantanamo?” question at a hearing for the lower court seat she occupies. Apparently, being a public defender is a crime in the Republican version of America.She was a public defender. That right there is a big mark in her favor.
I think being qualified for the position is the real crime for Republicans.Or the biggest mark against her if you’re a Republican. They already tried the “did you defend the terrorists at Guantanamo?” question at a hearing for the lower court seat she occupies. Apparently, being a public defender is a crime in the Republican version of America.
I also don’t think she sexually harassed or raped anybody. Gonna be hard to win any GOP senators over with that kind of record.I think being qualified for the position is the real crime for Republicans.
It is curious, isn't it? Brings to mind the adage that they accuse others of that which they do themselves.I thought it was pathetic to see old white guys lecturing her as if they care so deeply about child porn. They came across as obsessed with it.
Her last two votes includes at least a few Republicans, including the asshats performing for the cameras during these hearings (looking at you Ladybug Graham!!). The best revenge will be seeing her seated on the court soon.Nobody could attack her on being unqualified or too liberal. That should tell you everything you need to know. Unfortunately, the party of “no” would vote against Solomon himself, if nominated by a Democrat.
Well, let them all make their speeches for the cameras, remind everybody that they are petulant children, and Jackson will be confirmed for the Supreme Court anyway.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.