Just want to say that "tariff" is just a fancy word for import tax. So it is a tax (which is indiscriminate) which will burden the poor a lot more than the rich.It's worth considering what T's insane fixation on tariffs is based on - not simply the crazy idea that it would be neat to turn back the clock where tariffs, not taxes, were the source of federal revenue.
But it's still a taxation system, only instead of passing them as laws with approval from both houses of congress it's done on the whim of a corrupt businessman who changes his mind 3 times before breakfast.It's worth considering what T's insane fixation on tariffs is based on - not simply the crazy idea that it would be neat to turn back the clock where tariffs, not taxes, were the source of federal revenue.
The key factor is than in contrast to our taxation system, which is at least mildly progressive (meaning the tax burden is moved somewhat away from the poor to those that can afford it - and we are very far from - say - the European standard) tariffs are by their nature strongly regressive.
So big picture: decimate the tax revenue with his trillions of tax cuts favoring the rich, replace some of the tax revenue lost with strongly regressive tariffs.
The only dictators involved here have been excluded from his tariffs. This statement is totally backwards.Not to mention that wielding tariffs is the ideal tool to exercise authoritarian/dictatorial powers by fine tuning them as favors vs sanctions in exchange for whatever you want.
He’s put tremendous thought into this. See above.He's put zero thought into this
But it's still a taxation system, only instead of passing them as laws with approval from both houses of congress it's done on the whim of a corrupt businessman who changes his mind 3 times before breakfast.
He's put zero thought into this and not even the most seasoned economists can see an end game that doesn't lead us all down the path of being totally screwed, while at the same time alienating our closest allies.
I believe you are missing my point, sorry if I wasn't clear.The only dictators involved here have been excluded from his tariffs. This statement is totally backwards.
I think maybe @Eric misread 'exercise' as 'exorcise'?I believe you are missing my point, sorry if I wasn't clear.
Yes, of course it's a taxation system, as quarkysg already said above, tariffs = import taxes. And your point of the corrupt and mindless changes is exactly what my final point highlights.
The dictator wannabe Trump is very much involved here. How is my statement backwards?
I would be careful about ascribing planning and thought to Trump. This isn’t to suggest that he isn’t extremely dangerous but he is mostly instinctive. He has power so he uses power to hurt people to gain more power. There are people on his administration who are of slightly higher intelligence (eg the project 2025 formulators) but competence isn’t amongst the traits shared by even them.He’s put tremendous thought into this. See above.
What's more, they have apparently restricted export of additional rare minerals to the US (https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202504/1331466.shtml — btw, what's with people not providing original sources anymore?)CNN:
China imposes 34% reciprocal tariffs on imports of US goods in retaliation for Trump’s trade war
China said on Friday it will impose reciprocal 34% tariffs on all imports from the United States from April 10, making good on a promise to strike back after US President Donald Trump escalated a global trade war.
On Wednesday, Trump unveiled an additional 34% tariffs on all Chinese goods imported into the US, in a move poised to cause a major reset of relations and worsen trade tension between the world’s two largest economies.
“This practice of the US is not in line with international trade rules, seriously undermines China’s legitimate rights and interests, and is a typical unilateral bullying practice,” China’s State Council Tariff Commission said in a statement announcing its retaliatory tariffs
Exactly. Why would any company invest in moving production to the US given how likely it is for the tariffs to be removed in the medium term? And with retaliatory tariffs from other countries in place, it's not like US-produced items can be shipped somewhere else in the event of reduced domestic demand. You'd be paying for both high tariffs and high cost of labor.And the thing is, why bother? If I were a CEO of a large company, I'd probably just pull my belt tighter and hope to endure the orange menace.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.