- Joined
- Nov 9, 2021
- Posts
- 4,296
- Main Camera
- iPhone
It’s a huge convenience, but many people can get along with just rotating a couple of external drives if they don’t need the capacity or fault tolerance of a NAS (or its other features, like acting as a Time Capsule for Time Machine backups, a Plex server, etc.)
I'm happy to see this discussion popping up again. You might remember kicking this around on another thread 3-4 months ago, where I was contemplating using a NAS direct ethernet connected to my main computer and then having the NAS ethernet connected (via one of its other RJ-45s) to a switch (and other stuff) in a closet to further distribute around the house via Ethernet and three ceiling mounted WiFi APs.
I'm still on the fence about the NAS option.
On the one hand, my wife and I have used TM and clones to back up our computers for a long time. With multiple backups for redundancy, some offsite. Easy peasy. For both of us. Never a problem or issue.
On the other, I keep getting tugged setting up a NAS and centralizing all that to one box in one location. A big part of that is the lure of learning something new with a nice shiny new piece of tech to discover. That's me being a tech junkie who lives to fool around with tech stuff. But that's not my wife (she's an artist), who doesn't mind tech, but doesn't get excited about it. I do think it makes sense from an organizational and easy semi-automated backup/redundancy point of view.
And that leads to encumbering additional complexity over TM/clones that have met our needs for years. Still weighing that. If I was single, for sure as I like leaning/playing with new stuff. If I became incapacitated for some reason, or kicked the bucket, would my wife staring at a black box full of disk drives be able to carry on with that system? I think that could be a pretty big ask if that should happen.
So...still on the fence.