U
User.45
Guest
You are really, really, really missing the context:At least half the country is insane and wielding the right to vote while successfully (for now) repressing the vote of sane people. Are you really confident they can be outvoted at this point? Have the deplorables returned to under their rocks or decreased in number? Do you honestly believe "Just stop being insane" is going to change anything? Maybe for the comfort level of this thread, but in the outside world? I can easily see it as "Hush. The adults are speaking." which is both true and kind of hilariously insulting. "My point" ultimately doesn't matter if "the point" of this Covid-19 thread is just to share knowledge and agree with each other. I'm suggesting maybe we try to think about better responding to insane people. I find it kind of disappointing that the traditional party of mental health issues advocacy stops short of indoctrination mental health issues, fuck them. Call back when you've been both human trafficked and told the left is a bunch of lying evil communists. I don't plan to frequently pop in here and drop negativity. I've already made non controversial posts in this thread. I'm not a one note buzzkill pony. I just wanted to share this specific event.
Honestly I don't think this specific moment is a big deal or red check mark. I just brought it up and responded, sometimes at great length, to discuss this specific aspect of covid reporting and how each side has decided to treat it in their narrative. Hey, maybe if I stop sharing it then it isn't actually happening and we won't have to think about it because its icky negative boo.
1. The CDC director is not a politician.
2. COVID isn't a partisan issue (it shouldn't be)
3. You overestimate the insanity in the RW (hint: you think people like Cruz are insane?)
Did she do the right thing? Yes
Did this do harm to the cause? No.
Did she get more attention? Yes.
Is this action a net positive? Most likely.
My impression here is that you expect the wrong thing, from the wrong person, to cater to those nobody could cater to, for results nobody would realistically expect. You expect some sort of compromise to cater to people who aren't interested in compromises, and you describe her as a "bleeding heart liberal". She's the CDC director. Some RW people dismiss anybody who's qualified for a leadership position as the "elite".