- Joined
- Aug 15, 2020
- Posts
- 5,280
You almost feel sorry for them about making poor choices as an adult.
Trump is on Truth Social this morning attacking Ruby Freeman, defending January 6 and talking about fraud. Attacking innocent people and making up lies. Of course, if I am to believe Trump, then I also have to believe Ruby Freeman - a virtually unknown elderly black woman from Georgia - outsmarted the great Donald J. Trump. Which is very easy to believe, but its not what actually happened.
You have to really grimace at a guy upending the lives of regular citizens for NO REASON other than to make his lie more believable. A freaking former president endangering the life of a random black lady and causing her harm. It sickens me.
Trump’s offensive against Ruby Freeman reaches an ugly new level
As Donald Trump renews his offensive against an innocent election worker in Georgia, remember that his own team told him these claims weren't true.www.msnbc.com
Indeed. I cannot imagine being targets by POTUS, but it had to be a million times worse being targeted by Trump and his bucket of crazy racists.Disgusting what Ruby Freeman and Shaye Moss had to endure.
Its been too quiet. Bringing up fears of it all just disappearing.Where are you Jack Smith and Merrick Garland? There's enough to start indictments just over the stolen documents.
I think they're working on sending all of them to Brazil for processing, along with George Santos.Its been too quiet. Bringing up fears of it all just disappearing.
Its been too quiet. Bringing up fears of it all just disappearing.
Nah, they're just too busy releasing the SS#'s of the witnesses.
With the final January 6th Subcommittee report being forwarded to the Justice Dept, it shouldn't be too long before Mango et al get some real heat and finally indictments. And don't forget the Special Grand Jury in Atlanta just wrapped up and forwarded its final report to the local DA. She may beat Smith & Garland to indictments.
I read that the National archives (apparently on accident) failed to redact about 2,000 SS numbers on White House guest lists they provided to the Jan 6 committee. According to the official request from the committee, the data was supposed to be sent to them, already redacted, by the National Archives.Where? I could use a few free social security numbers.
...for reasons.
The National Archives people are overwhelmed dealing with Mango's BS and right wing nonsense to come. They've already been put on notice by the incoming majority assholes. Wouldn't surprise me if their work gets even more complicated and overwhelming with resignations.So, it seems that somebody at the Archives missed redacting some, and the Jan 6 committee assumed it was all redacted and didn’t double check.
Or, if you’re a right wing talk radio host, it’s part of a vast left-wing conspiracy to intentionally release these numbers.
.....for reasons?
Or, if you’re a right wing talk radio host, it’s part of a vast left-wing conspiracy to intentionally release these numbers.
Tick. Tock!Where are you Jack Smith and Merrick Garland? There's enough to start indictments just over the stolen documents.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.