Rather than "likeability" (which is a something that is used, used against, and horribly weaponised, against women, people of colour, and, above all, women who are people of colourl), for my part, I'd far prefer to see competence, compassion, basic decency, an ability to delegate, intelligence and integrity, an ethical existence, and the capacity to make good decisons (good judgment) under pressure as criteria to be considered when choosing a ruler.I think she's always had a likeability problem and, lest we forget, there was some real division amongst Democrats in 2008 when Obama took center stage and squeezed her out, some have never gotten over that. IMO she's a policy wonk and I do like that about her but she's never really been able to win over the hearts of people and it's always been her biggest downfall.
For many people there's something to that. Almost from the moment Bill got into office we saw a concerted effort to cast Hillary as someone who carves up Dalmatians to make fur coats, and possibly slices up children to use as pepperoni on her pizza. She's hardly the best candidate around, but the vitriol aimed at her was just ridiculous.Are you sure high exposure to right ring media didn’t convert you into a zombie HRC hater on some level?
I have a hard time arguing with this. However, I would point out that this was the period in which the country fell in love with Ronald Reagan's corporatist philosophy and the Democrats felt that, to have any chance at winning, they had to play the "me too" game. (Doesn't mean I like it; I'm just saying.)I know this question wasn't aimed at me, but for those of us on the left who have a severe dislike for Bill, his administration is often sighted as when the Democrats shifted from being champions of the working class to being corporatists and going after the big money corruption that was previously associated with Republicans.
And in the end that's all that needs to be said.Hillary’s time has passed. That’s all I’ll say on the subject.
I have a hard time arguing with this. However, I would point out that this was the period in which the country fell in love with Ronald Reagan's corporatist philosophy and the Democrats felt that, to have any chance at winning, they had to play the "me too" game. (Doesn't mean I like it; I'm just saying.)
I mentioned in another thread a while back that I heard some black progressive activist going off with "Now the racist is out of the white house?! WTF are you talking about?!" in regards to Biden's race relations history.
I’ll amend your statement:Hillary 2024? Given the competition, she may be the Dems’ best hope
Hillary is 74 years old, which is like being bathed in the fountain of youth compared to Biden.thehill.com
Her and Trump and Biden need to call it a day and go TF away!
Bill Clinton? Tell me about his other offenses.My issue is largely with lefty voters who think their politicians are saints or are given a pass on a lot of issues because they feel Republicans are so much worse. There are still many who think Clinton's biggest or only offense was getting a blowjob.
There are racists on both sides. Trump supporters are just more open about it.
Austin, Texas is the most racist place I’ve ever been to and it votes overwhelmingly blue. Austin has a majority white population. Houston, on the other hand, is diverse as fuck. Houston gets a bad rep in TX because people here think diversity is "ghetto" I remember I ran a half marathon in Austin one year and afterwards I went out to brunch with some friends that I knew in Austin. I was surprised at the # of people I met that day that said things like "There are a lot of black people in Houston" with like a face of disgust when they found out I was visiting from Houston. When I was a college student in San Antonio back in the early 2000s we would sometimes go out for the weekend in Austin to party. It never failed. We would always meet someone that was like "there are a lot of Mexicans in SA" not even realizing that I am hispanic LOL All my friends know I DO NOT LIKE AUSTIN. It's the most fake liberal city ever. They marched for George Floyd and they pretend to care about minorities, but they don't want them in their city. Keep them in Houston or San Antonio.
I am not discounting that there are racists who are left leaning, but I got to ask... Does it make it right or less tolerable to be a "open" racist rather than a closeted one? Also I hope we are talking about true racism and not just the knee jerk reaction of calling people racist that seems to happen in everyday "wokeness". I guarantee that the racists numbers are heavily on the right rather than those the left.
Bill Clinton? Tell me about his other offenses.
Bill Clinton? Tell me about his other offenses.
Fantastic book, really makes you understand how much damage the Democratic Party has done to working people while still messaging like they’re the party of Labor.Also....
Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?: Frank, Thomas: 9781250118134: Amazon.com: Books
Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People? [Frank, Thomas] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People?www.amazon.com
Great eye opening read, and written by a liberal.
"Hailed as “the most prescient book” of the year, Listen, Liberal accurately described what ailed the Democratic Party even before the election of 2016 made their weaknesses obvious. It is the story of how the “Party of the People” detached itself from its historic constituency among average Americans and chose instead to line up with the winners of our new economic order.
Now with a new afterword, Thomas Frank’s powerful analysis offers the best diagnosis to date of the liberal malady. Drawing on years of research and firsthand reporting, Frank points out that the Democrats have over the last decades increasingly abandoned their traditional goals: expanding opportunity, fighting for social justice, and ensuring that workers get a fair deal. With sardonic wit and lacerating logic, he uncovers the corporate and cultural elitism that have largely eclipsed the party’s old working- and middle-class commitment. And he warns that the Democrats’ only chance of regaining their health and averting a future of ever-increasing inequality is a return to their historic faith."
Fantastic book, really makes you understand how much damage the Democratic Party has done to working people while still messaging like they’re the party of Labor.
Clinton’s administration was a list of Republican initiatives getting signed into law under a Democratic president. It used to be a point of pride that he and I share a birthday….until I actually started paying attention to politics and policies instead of watching corporate media.
Don’t you remember when he pushed those teenage boys in front of a train?Bill Clinton? Tell me about his other offenses.
You keep saying shit like this. The actual Left does not like Ms. Clinton and never did, which is probably one reason she lost in '16. She is an arrogant elitist corporatist, and I voted for her only because the alternative was unimaginably bad. The Left does not like Joe the President much either, for many of 5he same reasons, but at least he lacks her shrill.I think she is the left's version of Trump
Imagine her saying "just grab 'em by the cock". Yeah man, just like Trump!No, I didn't like her back when Bill was running and this was even before FoxNews existed.
Other than her being unlikable, I think she is the left's version of Trump. You know they did some sketchy stuff, but have always gotten away with it for whatever reason.
Now that I think of how the world is going, at this point I wouldn’t be surprised if Trump and Clinton would just join forces and run in the same ticket just in order to be resurrected somehow. What a nightmare scenario.
I'm about ready for that age limit requirement. Bernie? He's 80, he'd be pushing 90 at the end of his first term.
I think in addition to cognitive issues, there's just a general health concern for a person who has to be firing on all cylinders, 24/7, who is required to be pretty physical, travel, move quickly from place to place, deal with 16 hour days, it's a strain that's going have far more impact on someone who's 75 vs. someone who's 60.
Just standardize it at the same age as retirement, then there's kind of an established reference age for "Ready to no longer work".
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.