- Joined
- Aug 15, 2020
- Posts
- 8,667

However Bad You Thought The Sandy Hook Defamation Case Would Go For Alex Jones, Yesterday Was WORSE - Above the Law
Can you get hard time in a civil tort suit?

Just finished reading that… absolutely unbelievable!![]()
However Bad You Thought The Sandy Hook Defamation Case Would Go For Alex Jones, Yesterday Was WORSE - Above the Law
Can you get hard time in a civil tort suit?abovethelaw.com
Just finished reading that… absolutely unbelievable!
That was gold man, he and his team obviously learned nothing from the secret service about nuking texts.Sorry - just saw this thread. I posted the following in the Jan 6th thread because that committee is now looking into subpoenaing the information.
https://www.Twitter or X not allowed/i/web/status/1554869293581582344/
What’s weird is the sequence. Ethical lawyers, upon getting evidence from the other side that they think may have been sent by mistake, do what the plaintiffs’ lawyers did and asked. So the defense lawyers KNEW they turned it over, at least as of a couple days ago. They failed to assert privilege (probably because nothing was privileged in them), so they knew.That was gold man, he and his team obviously learned nothing from the secret service about nuking texts.
Maybe he doesn’t have enough money to pay them, so they just don’t give aWhat’s weird is the sequence. Ethical lawyers, upon getting evidence from the other side that they think may have been sent by mistake, do what the plaintiffs’ lawyers did and asked. So the defense lawyers KNEW they turned it over, at least as of a couple days ago. They failed to assert privilege (probably because nothing was privileged in them), so they knew.
But on the stand, Jones was apparently surprised, and kept lying about not having any relevant texts right up until the plaintiffs’ lawyer told him he had the texts.
Why didn’t Jones know what his own attorneys knew, that his texts were in the hands of the plaintiffs?
You have to wonder if he's like Trump and just doesn't care because he's a sociopath, sounds like he's been a loose canon this entire time. I'm just a laymen but it made that attorney look really bad to me.What’s weird is the sequence. Ethical lawyers, upon getting evidence from the other side that they think may have been sent by mistake, do what the plaintiffs’ lawyers did and asked. So the defense lawyers KNEW they turned it over, at least as of a couple days ago. They failed to assert privilege (probably because nothing was privileged in them), so they knew.
But on the stand, Jones was apparently surprised, and kept lying about not having any relevant texts right up until the plaintiffs’ lawyer told him he had the texts.
Why didn’t Jones know what his own attorneys knew, that his texts were in the hands of the plaintiffs?
Maybe he doesn’t have enough money to pay them, so they just don’t give a.
sounds like he uses the same firms trump uses.Sorry - just saw this thread. I posted the following in the Jan 6th thread because that committee is now looking into subpoenaing the information.
https://www.Twitter or X not allowed/i/web/status/1554869293581582344/
No. This is a civil case. Bad lawyers are no excuse. He may be able to sue his own lawyers, but it doesn’t look like this episode provides much of a basis to do so - they had a legal obligation to turn over those documents. If they did so by accident, so what? “I told my lawyers to commit discovery violations and they messed up and turned over the documents anyway” isn’t a basis to sue your attorneys.Not any type of legal eagle, but doesn't this give Jones an out for appeal or mistrial? Can he just claim that his legal team failed to provide hime a sound defense?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.