This has been a thing I noticed. Some people think that these things are stupid, therefore she is stupid.Yep, any variation of:
Will be deemed as "stupid" by Republicans.
- Healthcare for all
- Everyone should eat
- Equality for black people, LGBTQ or Women
- Rich paying their fair share
I know a few other people that feel the same way as you. She can be a polarizing figure.We used to have long conversations with Jay about AOC in MR PRSI.
I am not conservative nor am I a Republican.
I am not fond of her.
She might be a colour shade on the US political palette but nothing more in my eyes.
She's a little too left for my taste and not very diplomatic for a politician, but that's kind of a virtue and I like her straight shooting.I know a few other people that feel the same way as you. She can be a polarizing figure.
However, like her or not. she is far from stupid.
I know a few other people that feel the same way as you. She can be a polarizing figure.
However, like her or not. she is far from stupid.
Still awaiting concrete examples instead of hyperbole.Would you agree though she can say some really stupid things?
I have to give her credit for being able to use SM to promote herself during her primary with Crowley. Plus she hit the streets and put in the face time with the voters. Can't deny that.She is far from being stupid if she was able to rise to a position she is in atm.
None of us here was able to complete this task.
Reminds me of a guy I went to college with.
Still awaiting concrete examples instead of hyperbole.
I think what some are asking of you though, is the specific instances you are referring to as her saying "stupid things". In many cases she can back up what she's said with some facts & stats. Meanwhile her counterparts on the right often say "stupid things", but get called out by everyone but those who line up politically with them.Would you agree though she can say some really stupid things?
Would you agree though she can say some really stupid things?
She is far from being stupid if she was able to rise to a position she is in atm.
None of us here was able to complete this task.
Take a look at her general tone. She tends to give normal responses in plain English, that do not tend to leverage shared sentiment. Even if you can find a small number of wacky examples (and I don't think that's a given), it would not change the general demeanor she sets forth.
Thanks, now we have actual stuff to talk about.1) It's more important to be morally right than factually correct.
2) We could save $21T a year by keeping a tighter control on the pentagon budget
3)Unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs
Here is a start with links to verify each one and not a single Fox, Breitbart, NewMax or OAN source.
But Boebert or Greene or even Trump are very very very low bars. I'd put Rand Paul there whom for some reason isn't called the idiot he actually is on a regular basis.This is a pretty brilliant assessment of some her communications. They're not "stupid", as that suggests poor intuitiveness, introspection, I think they're a touch inexperienced (in the context of "the game") because some of her HERF DERF SHE SAID, comments, when distilled down to the core concept are still pretty fucking smart, and several orders-of-magnitude beyond anything Greene or Boebert have managed to crap out of their face orifice (they are spectacularly stupid).
3) The analysis seems fair here, it's a stupid statement, but again the basic premise is major growth in inequalities and trumped up economical numbers. Just remember what happened in the first few weeks of the COVID lockdown...Companies that were bailed out and ended up spending billions on stock buybacks that benefited CEOs and shareholders disproportionately while these companies remained vulnerable and needed another bail out. This isn't how capitalism supposed to work...
Yes.This is probably a topic for a separate thread, but should you blame companies from using the law to their advantage or the pols that passed it for not putting more controls in it?
Ummmm....you just made AOC's point you listed as #1 above.This is probably a topic for a separate thread, but should you blame companies from using the law to their advantage or the pols that passed it for not putting more controls in it?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.