Herdfan
Resident Redneck
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2021
- Posts
- 5,414
I'll call him out as being incorrect. Yet I can also see that his intentions seem to be good. As others have mentioned, I don't expect the president to be a source of sound medical advice. But the president should act as a guidepost in my opinion, pointing people in the right direction. I feel he's met that criteria.
So it would have been nice if it had been a more accurate statement from the president. But at least he's not actively pointing people in the wrong direction.
I'm not sure what level of "calling out" you're looking for here. But I'm willing to meet you that far.
And I would give him more credit had the WH not refused to comment on it. Had they simply corrected his statement it would be one thing, but they didn't.
I'll keep it in mind next time you get caught on an "inconsistency."
Ohh, this sudden longing for accuracy. This "incredibly stupid" statement overestimates risk reduction of the vaccines by 15% in a speech that intends to promote an intervention that reduces COVID deaths by 92%. Interestingly, lies that claimed tens of thousands of lives were not a deal breaker for you in the past as a repeat Trump voter.
For someone who has my posts on IGNORE, you certainly seem to know a lot about them.