Yoused
up
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2020
- Posts
- 6,696
- Solutions
- 1
INFWRDI2024 might be the first year that we do see massive dead voter fraud.
INFWRDI2024 might be the first year that we do see massive dead voter fraud.
Here’s the full article about this phenomenon… paywall removed:View attachment 9660
Just sayin’. No reason to draw conclusions
…other then there are substantially less Trump voters around. 2024 might be the first year that we do see massive dead voter fraud.
These people hate socialism, but actually the most legitimate criticism of socialism is that there will be people who will not respect shared resources. Like in this pandemic where now >90% of the healthcare resources are spent on unvaccinated people. If this was a just system, they'd pay proportionately more for insurance, just like in Singapore where the unvaccinated have to foot bill for their COVID care.Here’s the full article about this phenomenon… paywall removed:
U.S. Covid Deaths Get Even Redder (Published 2021)
The partisan gap in Covid’s death toll has grown faster over the past month than at any previous point.www.nytimes.com
It's somewhat surprising that third-party payers haven't done something similar. Paying more for coverage if you engage in risky practices is a well-established tenet in the insurance industry.These people hate socialism, but actually the most legitimate criticism of socialism is that there will be people who will not respect shared resources. Like in this pandemic where now >90% of the healthcare resources are spent on unvaccinated people. If this was a just system, they'd pay proportionately more for insurance, just like in Singapore where the unvaccinated have to foot bill for their COVID care.
I'm surprised too. It's probably bad business insuring these people.It's somewhat surprising that third-party payers haven't done something similar. Paying more for coverage if you engage in risky practices is a well-established tenet in the insurance industry.
You two clearly have different value systems. TC's strategy makes sense if you forget about most of our hopes to be valuable/contributing members of society and replace it with the goal of maximizing power and financial comfort achieved with the lowest effort. He created a persona that only flies with red voters but in exchange, he really don't have to perform, just be vocal. He'll never be president, and he knows, but all he has to do is type in some offensively stupid shit to Twitter and as long as he isn't freebasing money and gets his bribes legally, he'll be set for life.I guess so but imagine going through the trouble of getting a law degree and ultimately just conducting yourself like a 19 year old Infowars commenter. He’s beholden to zero standards of professionalism, he just talks shit all day.
It's somewhat surprising that third-party payers haven't done something similar. Paying more for coverage if you engage in risky practices is a well-established tenet in the insurance industry.
It’s not that simple.Pretty sure the ACA banned this practice.
Risk-adjusted premiums are widely applied for auto, life, travel, and other forms of insurance, and the ACA allows premium adjustment based on tobacco use. To be clear, I think healthcare coverage should be provided to everyone, perhaps with penalties and/or incentives for a few specific behaviors such as smoking, though that's unlikely to ever come to pass here.Pretty sure the ACA banned this practice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.