Nineteen fifty? Shooting a little high, there, I think. Somethingteen fifty is being generous.I feel like they just want it to be circa 1950 again.
My impression of the right-wing complaints in this vein are that we, as a society, are marginalizing people with publicly expressed opinions that are considered offensive. I don’t agree that publicly expressed opinions should be ignored when it comes to inclusion in society, but they are entitled to that cultural commentary and can complain about it all they want.I used to be Republican but I'd be against this. Education should be about education, not indoctrination. As someone who spent most of his life on the other side of the political fence, it's interesting reading the thoughts/statements here. I do not intend to offend but it's interesting how similar it is, just a different type (spent most of my life listening to Republicans talk about Democrats).
Color me a pessimist but, hypocrisy abounds in us as a species - right or left. Imo, any form of forced control has been historically proven to be a bad thing. The moment you try to tell people what to think and how to think, bad things happen. Stuff like this only widens the divide.
I don't get it, banning the use of words doesn't seem like a very right wing thing to do, especially after complaining about all the PC things that can't be talked about anymore.
I remember sex ed in high school. We had a group of people come in and talk to us about how STDs were a bad thing and how having sex with anyone was like a piece of tape that got weaker over time with each use - (encouraging one partner). Then we watched a video of a birth, completely uncensored, which traumatized a lot of people.
The thing is, they just don‘t, won’t stop as long as we keep electing them- destruction of women’s rights, LGBT rights, democratic rights, racial equality under the law, attacking the Constitution, funding the War Machine (for which Democrats also deserve harsh criticism), but right now we must prioritize the dire threats facing the Nation and that would be what is called the GOP.
I went to the Principle’s Office with a friend by refusing to stand and say it, to prove a point about the Pledge of Allegiance in 1970. The thing is we want our citizens to feel allegiance towards our country, but it’s damned tricky when it comes to forced public displays in support of it.School is the perfect place to start the brain washing indoctrination early. Personally I don't believe that pledging allegiances to flags, or singing national anthems in schools is all that healthy, but what do I know.
The thing is, they just don‘t, won’t stop as long as we keep electing them- destruction of women’s rights, LGBT rights, democratic rights, racial equality under the law, attacking the Constitution, funding the War Machine (for which Democrats also deserve harsh criticism), but right now we must prioritize the dire threats facing the Nation and that would be what is called the GOP.
If Disney leaves Florida, there goes the “no income tax” motive for moving there. Florida gets most of their state revenue from tourism taxes, sales taxes, and property taxes. I doubt they could afford to leave though, with how much they’ve invested in Disney World over the years.Why stop at schools? We should stop everyone from ever saying anything that might make us haz a sad. Not even where we cannot hear it.
It’s not just ‘Don’t Say Gay.” Florida also ordered Disney to alter its diversity training | Commentary
For decades, Disney and Florida politicians have had a symbiotic relationship — kind of like dung beetles and skunk cabbage. Much like the beetles pollinate the foul-smelling plants, Disney w…www.orlandosentinel.com
I mean Disney FFS. That notorious bastion of the far left.
of course it does not say gay thats a scary word.I will make a $500 donation to the charity of your choice if anyone can show where the word "gay" is in the bill.
No limits. So an LGBTQ or BLM or any other legit charity you want the donation to go to.
Just have to show where the word "gay" is in the bill.
I will make a $500 donation to the charity of your choice if anyone can show where the word "gay" is in the bill.
No limits. So an LGBTQ or BLM or any other legit charity you want the donation to go to.
Just have to show where the word "gay" is in the bill.
It’s just a nickname for the bill. You realize that, right?I will make a $500 donation to the charity of your choice if anyone can show where the word "gay" is in the bill.
No limits. So an LGBTQ or BLM or any other legit charity you want the donation to go to.
Just have to show where the word "gay" is in the bill.
Dude.It’s just a nickname for the bill. You realize that, right?
The bill says: “classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age-appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students…”
Who determines what is age-appropriate? The state. How? Nobody knows; they kept it very vague. And why is the discussion of sexual orientation or gender identity only considered appropriate for kids of a certain age? After all, some kids will have same-sex couples as parents, or a transgender family member. How does a teacher handle it when kids start talking about their family in class?
Foofer was right: the far-right legislators who wrote this malarkey are too scared to say the word themselves.
Pat RobertsonWho determines what is age-appropriate?
It’s just a nickname for the bill. You realize that, right?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.