Yoused
up
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2020
- Posts
- 6,938
- Solutions
- 1
I was thinking that too. There was no internet or smartphone tech in the 50s when I was a kid. Children who were not told some version of "the facts of life" by their parents learned a usually somewhat more explicit version from friends on the playground.
When I was in third grade, my parents took me to a house 5 blocks away before school, which I returned to after school until the came and got me (it was about 2 blocks to school from there). There was a book on the coffee table, A Baby is Born, or somesuch. It was nice bright and inviting, no one told me to read it, they all just let natural curiosity take its course.
It had medical-style illustrations of genital structure and explained the basic reproductive function of the parts. It said something to the effect of "the husband and wife lie very close together and he passes his sperm to her", but left the concept of PIV up to the imagination. I mean, my parents would never do that, eww. I visualized a son with his microscope on the couch as his parents were on either side (fully clothed, of course) and suddenly the boy sees a cloud of sperm pass under his lens.
Oddly, the woman's 5-year-old daughter liked to lift up her dress to display herself to me. I am not sure if that was a coincidence or if she was trained to further my education with real imagery. But no one ever gave me "the talk". My parents never discussed sex with me at all, they just made sure I was able to get the appropriate misinformation.
And, of course, how do you teach children about coping with the emotional vectors? Is it possible? In a culture where sex is supposed to be confined to wedlock, how would one deal with young people's desires and feelings in a pragmatic way? Especially given that children are naturally rebellious and doing the bad thing makes it that much more fun.