D
Deleted member 199
Guest
You can be registered as whatever you want. You asked why a bunch of anti-vaxxer right winger conspiracy theorists believe that a microchip could fit down a small guage needle, I'm just telling you: it's par for the course with these people.Let me give you a little hint. I am not a registered Republican. In fact, I am registered as a Democrat.
Heh, old habits die hard huh.These are my opinions, so there are no sources.
You don't think it's at all involved in the solution, or you don't think it's the only solution?I simply don't think increased taxes are the solution.
For example, if a tax credit were offered for companies that invest in genuinely improved processes/practices/machinery/whatever, but an existing corporate taxable deduction or special rate or whatever was allowed to expire, is that "taxes bad"? Or is it rewarding companies that embrace newer, more efficient processes and technologies, and as a result reduce/eliminate their impact on climate change?
That's a very loaded term, the way you seem to be using it. I'm sympathetic to muslims being yet another ostracised, mistreated minority in certain countries. But I feel like you're using it the way the French used it to describe some people in WW2..I believe he could be a Muslim sympathizer.
So, that'd be a "no" on having seen how gun control actually works in other places then?I believe we need to control the guns in the hands of criminals, not law-abiding citizens. Control those first, then we can talk.
Even as a father now, I don't honestly remember the details of what development stage is reached when, and would suggest doctors are better placed than I to suggest when development is beyond just "a ball of cells", but generally I agree.I am not opposed to abortion. I just think you should be able to make that decision within the first trimester. Mid-second at the latest. Just like most of the European countries people like to hold up as examples. Some European countries even have mandatory waiting periods. Abortion should be safe, legal and rare.
.... Wut? Is "no-more-baby shower" a thing people do now? Are you suggesting there are masses of people out there demanding the right to have an abortion on a whim at 37 weeks or something?I do not agree with those who celebrate their abortions.
Rich people buying shit and paying the wages of poorer people is an inevitable facet of capitalism, that isn't what trickle down economics is about, really. It's specifically about giving those rich people tax breaks, under the claim that they'll spend that money and it'll end up in the hands of the poor.There has to be be some element of trickle down in any working economic model. If I want to buy a $10M yacht, there are a lot of people who will earn a living from my purchase.
There's one little wrinkle though. It demonstrably does not work.
For example (because paraphrasing is just going to butcher the details):
A 2020 working paper by London School of Economics and Political Science researchers compared the results of countries that passed tax cuts in a specific year with those that did not, over a five decade period from 1965 to 2015 in the 18 member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. It found that contrary to the claims of trickle-down theory, tax cuts for the rich had no "significant effect on employment or economic growth". They found no evidence that the cuts induced "labour supply responses" from high-income individuals (i.e. "lead to more hours of work, more effort, etc.") that boosted economic activity. They did find evidence of a "sizable" increase in income inequality. "Major tax cuts for the rich increase the top 1% share of pre-tax national income in the years following the reform. The magnitude of the effect is sizeable; on average, each major reform leads to a rise in top 1% share of pre-tax national income of 0.8 percentage points."[6]
You as a squillionaire spending money on expensive shit obviously puts money into the economy - but giving you a tax break hoping you'll do that, and pretending that it's as-good or better than giving the 'working class' a fairer tax system and the benefits of a society with money to spend (yes, from taxes on your squillions) is naive at best.