If this thread were about unmasked Democrats on a plane we could maybe understand your obsession but it's really more about COVID in general so please stop derailing it. Feel free to start your own thread if you want.And a sixth person on the flight has now tested positive. That's 10%.
And this will most likely be the last update on this because they are stopping updates
It's off topic but he has no idea that just the terminology he uses gives away his sources on the topic. For a medical person "late-term" means absolutely nothing and this term is used exactly for this reason. The catch-all medical term is viability which is a moving target when it comes to foeti.
Thus far we have learnt that @Herdfan knows nothing about women (cis or trans), Blacks, Obama, Muslims, biology, ecology, economics, hell, even Hispanics. While I consider my duty to fight ignorance, I too have limits to my ambitions. I doubt we'd be able to rectify any of these deficiencies.
I kind of think the linked "summarised online" text is wrong, isn't that linking to the aforementioned 'letter' that a bunch of them signed? I got caught up in 5 pages of names and institutes in it and figured it can't be a 'summary' at that point.Heeeey. The money is in the subsequent paragraphs:
Imo, Obama instead of kowtowing to terrorists was trying to avoid sounding like he was against all Muslims. I’m not sure about what the significance is of saying ISIS vs ISIL? If it’s the same organization, or no?I addressed this before. But he refused to say "Radical Islamic Terrorist" and insisted on calling ISIS ISIL when even the liberal media called it ISIS.
So it is just my opinion.
And how many of them have serious symptoms, or been hospitalised? So far I've seen two articles saying they collectively have zero or mild symptoms.And a sixth person on the flight has now tested positive. That's 10%.
And this will most likely be the last update on this because they are stopping updates
It depends on the translation from Arabic basically. Neither is a literal 1:1 translation from the original name,I’m not sure about what the significance is of saying ISIS vs ISIL? If it’s the same organization, or no?
Yeah this is the issue. The vaccine was tested for preventing symptomatic disease, they didn't study the efficacy in preventing asymptomatic disease to that same scale (AFAIK). This is why this tells very little about anything, other than masks should be worn in larger groups in spaces with close circuit ventilation. Nothing new here.And how many of them have serious symptoms, or been hospitalised? So far I've seen two articles saying they collectively have zero or mild symptoms.
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1417492319016833029/KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: Profile Of The Unvaccinated | KFF
This report explores the roughly a third of adults who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine and finds that, compared to vaccinated adults, they are younger, more likely to identify as Republican or Republican-leaning, with lower incomes and education levels, and more likely to be uninsured.www.kff.org
What does ISIL stand for vs what does ISIS stand for?I addressed this before. But he refused to say "Radical Islamic Terrorist" and insisted on calling ISIS ISIL when even the liberal media called it ISIS.
So it is just my opinion.
So, while I realise you aren't a virologist or epidemiologist, to the best of your knowledge if someone has it, but is asymptomatic - does that suggest they're not being 'harmed' internally (i.e. severe lung damage is a common one with CODID, right?)? I thought symptoms were generally either (a) directly because of the harm being done (e.g. trouble breathing due to physical damage to lung tissue), or (b) a result of your bodies attempt to fight it off (e.g. fever). Is there a scenario where it's doing damage internally, but the person has zero symptoms?Yeah this is the issue. The vaccine was tested for preventing symptomatic disease, they didn't study the efficacy in preventing asymptomatic disease to that same scale (AFAIK). This is why this tells very little about anything, other than masks should be worn in larger groups in spaces with close circuit ventilation. Nothing new here.
If this thread were about unmasked Democrats on a plane we could maybe understand your obsession but it's really more about COVID in general so please stop derailing it. Feel free to start your own thread if you want.
Nah, legit question.So, while I realise you aren't a virologist or epidemiologist, to the best of your knowledge if someone has it, but is asymptomatic - does that suggest they're not being 'harmed' internally (i.e. severe lung damage is a common one with CODID, right?)? I thought symptoms were generally either (a) directly because of the harm being done (e.g. trouble breathing due to physical damage to lung tissue), or (b) a result of your bodies attempt to fight it off (e.g. fever). Is there a scenario where it's doing damage internally, but the person has zero symptoms?
Not being snarky if that wasn't obvious.
The point is the only discussion you are having about it is related to dems on a plane and that's it. We get it man, you've beaten this dead horse over and over and over, it's hyperpartisan and your ONLY angle. Go bitch about it in the political forum.Sure thing. It's your party.
But the unmasked Democrats on the plane have now infected two staffers, one WH and one from Pelosi's office with COVID. So if that isn't about COVID, then I guess I don't understand the purpose of the thread. But I will acquiesce to your request. Will also not respond to questions others posted in this thread not dealing with COVID.
I'll add that those who got the shots first (i.e. our "essential" politicians) will be the first set of people with breakthrough infections if there's a time element here (and there is).The point is the only discussion you are having about it is related to dems on a plane and that's it. We get it man, you've beaten this dead horse over and over and over, it's hyperpartisan and your ONLY angle. Go bitch about it in the political forum.
Time for some to get deeply in their feelings, and decide that businesses should NOT be allowed to do what they want. ...Despite all that birthday cake talk...
I'll add that those who got the shots first (i.e. our "essential" politicians) will be the first set of people with breakthrough infections if there's a time element here (and there is).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.