Or at least negotiated for better terms! He truly did make a Godfather offer, so far above market value that Twitter's board likely would've faced a shareholder lawsuit for turning it down. He had the leverage to insist on revising the contract to provide standard outs for a buyer. For example, it's normal for such contracts to allow due diligence investigations before truly committing to buy, but the contract he signed explicitly waived diligence.@mr_roboto
Outstanding, thanks for that clarification, I didn't even realize what a simple, and problematic (for Musk) contract was executed. That makes sense, it was almost meant at a deterrent, hahaha, I'd imagine most people would've reviewed it, had a moment of introspection about their real intent and walked away.
Nobody should come away from this thinking Musk plays 5-D chess; it's more like 1-D checkers. Remember all that noise from him about how he should be able to get out of the contract because of Twitter's bot problem? Before he changed his mind about buying Twitter, he puffed himself up as Twitter's savior on the basis that he was going to swoop in and magically solve Twitter's bot problem. So, even if he hadn't signed away due diligence, Twitter's lawyers had a decent chance of prevailing on that point. He obviously knew about the bot problem before he signed the contract!
I feel sorry for whomever has to represent Musk in court. He's got to be one of the worst clients on the planet.