- Joined
- Sep 26, 2021
- Posts
- 7,187
- Main Camera
- Sony
Short-circuits are a fake woke concept
The Fall of Intel
- Thread starter Eric
- Start date
Short-circuits are a fake woke concept
Yoused
up
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2020
- Posts
- 8,086
- Solutions
- 1
But when you have a hard time getting all the current to go where you want, you get leakage. I think he can tell them everything there is to know about leakage.
I'm really not sure what the game plan is here.
If they'd provided funds: i can see it as being a matter of national security to save intel.
But to not provide any funding? Though i do hear this was a demand to continue to get the CHIPS act funds.
"I know more about semi manufactoring than anyone else"
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2021
- Posts
- 7,187
- Main Camera
- Sony
Intel details everything that could go wrong with US taking a 10% stake
Intel warns investors to brace for losses and uncertainties.
arstechnica.com
… in which it is revealed that the real reason Trump wants the stake in Intel is because the gov’t would then have inside information that he can trade stocks on in order to personally profit….
Intel details everything that could go wrong with US taking a 10% stake
Intel warns investors to brace for losses and uncertainties.
… in which it is revealed that the real reason Trump wants the stake in Intel is because the gov’t would then have inside information that he can trade stocks on in order to personally profit….
I’m not sure Intel needed to be told that they had to drop any diversity initiatives as part of the deal, but I’d bet the WH did so anyway.
Intel admits its high-end desktop PC chips 'fumbled the football,' disusses 18A yield challenges and performance, Panther Lake ramp
Bulk of Intel's shipments in 2H 2025 and 1H 2026 will still be Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake.
Intel being more downbeat and less defensive than usual, still assuring everyone of future success of course, but even that was somewhat more … measured. Interesting.
Intel's 14nm+++ desktop CPUs are making a comeback — chipmaker inexplicably resurrects Comet Lake from five years ago with 'new' Core i5-110
So, should we call this 10th Gen or Core Series 1?
Intel taking recycling seriously. Rereleasing a Comet Lake chip.
Intel takes the wraps off Panther Lake — first 18A client processor brings the best of Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake together in one package
Panther Lake brings the power efficiency and graphics performance of Lunar Lake and the platform flexibility of Arrow Lake all together on one SoC
So a tweaked core design for both E and P cores and new node, but I’m not sure that even Intel’s own relative performance prognosticators are all that impressive?
Starting with multicore:
Unless I’m misunderstanding Intel is comparing a 4+8+4 Panther Lake chip to a 4+4 Lunar Lake chip to get the 50% performance improvement at the same power, so that number doesn’t really seem useful? The second number comparing it Arrow Lake are like more germaine.
The ST is also odd because according to notebookcheck data on actual laptops Arrow Lake and Lunar Lake had vastly different efficiencies in the wild and yet here they are comparable?
The ARL-LNL curves do separate (and PTL gets better too relative to both) at lower power but overall this must be an Int vs FP issue since the Intel curve in the chart is on SpecInt while the notebookcheck data is using CB R24, mostly a floating point test.
It’s also odd that they chose such a high power draw for their main stat given that again it seems that PTL actually gets better at lower power draw. Advertising 10% performance improvement for the same power draw doesn’t seem that great? The 40% power efficiency is nice, but overall it seems this is mostly down to the node improvement. And even then it’s not clear how big an improvement that node is, given that Intel is jumping from N3B. So if this is the result how will Intel’s 18A compare to TSMC’s upcoming 2nm? -though of course 18A is launching first and will be competing again N3P. I’m just not sure TSMC should be worried by that even if Intel had its act together in terms of being a foundry for 3rd parties?
I do like the tile system (unsurprisingly I know) but basically I feel like I read a list of extremely promising sounding improvements - first to ribbon-FET, first to BSPD, new cores (okay even Intel admits they’re optimized designs) - to get just a decent but not massive upgrade in the end. Like I felt it was building to a much bigger reveal that what it was and maybe than it needed to be. But we’ll see.
diamond.g
Site Champ
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2021
- Posts
- 864
Intel announces XeSS 3 with XeSS-MFG "Multi Frame Generation" - VideoCardz.com
Intel XeSS3 gets Multi-Frame Generation up to 4x frames Announced at Intel Tech Tour 2025. At the Intel Tech Tour, the company officially announced XeSS 3, the next major version of its AI-based upscaling technology. A new feature called XeSS-MFG (Multi-Frame Generation) was also introduced...
videocardz.com
So Intel is joining the MFG club, that leave AMD and Apple as the odd ones out. They are the first to bring it to older GPU's as well.
