COVID Stupid

[The-Real-Deal82]

An interesting article I read the other day illustrating the frustrating reality of the anti-vaxx idiocy that has swept through social media and brainwashed people into risking their lives.

ICU is full of the unvaccinated – my patience with them is wearing thin | Anonymous

Most of the resources we are devoting to Covid in hospital are being spent on people who have not had jab, says an NHS consultant

www.theguardian.com

 

[MEJHarrison]

Got called out by this nutjob antivaxxer and I've been replying with links to the CDC They live in a bubble of ignorance and I don't think any real information gets to them. Social media is filled with them and it's really too bad that the likes of FB and Twitter allow it to propagate the way they do.

https://www.Twitter or X not allowed/i/web/status/1463926843879403521/

When I saw "@unhealthytruth", I pretty much didn't need to read any longer. That's a giant red flashing light that says "IGNORE THIS CONTENT". It's like branding your cigarettes "Death Sticks".

 

[Eric]

MacRumors, where you're not allowed to say "sure Jan" but you're free to spread lies about the vaccine.

 

[Pumbaa]

MacRumors, where you're not allowed to say "sure Jan" but you're free to spread lies about the vaccine.

View attachment 10035

Has anyone tried reporting the post? Multiple other posters have asked for citations/examples and none have been provided even though the antivaxxer has been active in the thread.

 

[Eric]

Has anyone tried reporting the post? Multiple other posters have asked for citations/examples and none have been provided even though the antivaxxer has been active in the thread.

No, I don't bother with reporting and they've made their policy about allowing it clear anyway.

 

[Cmaier]

No, I don't bother with reporting and they've made their policy about allowing it clear anyway.

I don’t see the issue. He’s right. I got three doses of the vaccine and now I grew a tail. They don’t tell you about the tail-growing.

 

[Eric]

I don’t see the issue. He’s right. I got three doses of the vaccine and now I grew a tail. They don’t tell you about the tail-growing.

Gotta read that fine print.

 

[Eric]

https://www.Twitter or X not allowed/i/web/status/1463187577129869312/

 

[SuperMatt]

https://www.Twitter or X not allowed/i/web/status/1463187577129869312/

What’s a gas station?

 

[Eric]

What’s a gas station?

I get the feeling you would get the same look had you pulled up in an electric car to go in and get a bag of chips.

 

[Renzatic]

I don’t see the issue. He’s right. I got three doses of the vaccine and now I grew a tail. They don’t tell you about the tail-growing.

You got a tail? LUCKY! All I got were a pair of gills under my ribcage.

I wouldn't be complaining about if they actually worked, but they don't. They're just for decoration.

 

[User.45]

Got called out by this nutjob antivaxxer and I've been replying with links to the CDC They live in a bubble of ignorance and I don't think any real information gets to them. Social media is filled with them and it's really too bad that the likes of FB and Twitter allow it to propagate the way they do.

https://www.Twitter or X not allowed/i/web/status/1463926843879403521/

It's a pretty funny response. "Holistic doctor Joe Rogan style" reminded me of this holistic animorph

 

[Eric]

It's a pretty funny response. "Holistic doctor Joe Rogan style" reminded me of this holistic animorph

Here he is owning a Lib who got vaccinated.

 

[User.45]

MacRumors, where you're not allowed to say "sure Jan" but you're free to spread lies about the vaccine.

View attachment 10035

First sentence is technically correct, but the real risk of undercalling vaccine side effects is ignoring inconveniences of some people, whereas overcalling those ignores the untimely death of a lot of people. I prefer to be correct, but if I err, I think inconvenience is a lot nicer than death.

Second sentence is hilariously loaded:
1. It implies that there's only one vaccine tech used, whereas there are 2 completely different techs used for the approved ones (mRNA vs. adenovirus packed DNA).
2. All approved vaccines are evidently more effective than the gold standard of therapy we've had (nothing, lol). This is actually a definition of a successful phase III
3. Not sure what a "robust [drug] design" means, but I do know that it's like fantasy football without phase 1/2 trials
4. There's absolutely no currently known drug that is near the cost-efficiency of vaccinations.

Third sentence is like: well, we could start with everyone getting vaccinated, FFS.

But hey, this guy "is an event manager and producer, with experience managing the biggest brand names and multi-million dollar campaigns" so he's gotta know what he's talking about, LOL.

https://amacfa.com

 

[Cmaier]

First sentence is technically correct, but the real risk of undercalling vaccine side effects is ignoring inconveniences of some people, whereas overcalling those ignores the untimely death of a lot of people. I prefer to be correct, but if I err, I think inconvenience is a lot nicer than death.

Second sentence is hilariously loaded:
1. It implies that there's only one vaccine tech used, whereas there are 2 completely different techs used for the approved ones (mRNA vs. adenovirus packed DNA).
2. All approved vaccines are evidently more effective than the gold standard of therapy we've had (nothing, lol). This is actually a definition of a successful phase III
3. Not sure what a "robust [drug] design" means, but I do know that it's like fantasy football without phase 1/2 trials
4. There's absolutely no currently known drug that is near the cost-efficiency of vaccinations.

Third sentence is like: well, we could start with everyone getting vaccinated, FFS.

But hey, this guy "is an event manager and producer, with experience managing the biggest brand names and multi-million dollar campaigns" so he's gotta know what he's talking about, LOL.

https://amacfa.com

that guy may have the most punchable face I’ve seen.

 

[Renzatic]

that guy may have the most punchable face I’ve seen.

Punchable face aside, I'm left wondering what it is he's trying to sell us here.

 

[Cmaier]

Punchable face aside, I'm left wondering what it is he's trying to sell us here.

The same thing any member of any cult is trying to sell potential new recruits.

 

[Renzatic]

The same thing any member of any cult is trying to sell potential new recruits.

That's literally what it is. He's basically selling an image of professionalism with no real substance behind it. He hints towards the availability of a number of company specific iOS apps, but mentions none by name, or provides any links to the App Store. Shows shots of him in front of a camera, but has no portfolio detailing his work. If you want to find out more, he only provides you a link to his email.

...stuff like this really irks me. I have no idea why, but it does.

 

[The-Real-Deal82]

First sentence is technically correct, but the real risk of undercalling vaccine side effects is ignoring inconveniences of some people, whereas overcalling those ignores the untimely death of a lot of people. I prefer to be correct, but if I err, I think inconvenience is a lot nicer than death.

Second sentence is hilariously loaded:
1. It implies that there's only one vaccine tech used, whereas there are 2 completely different techs used for the approved ones (mRNA vs. adenovirus packed DNA).
2. All approved vaccines are evidently more effective than the gold standard of therapy we've had (nothing, lol). This is actually a definition of a successful phase III
3. Not sure what a "robust [drug] design" means, but I do know that it's like fantasy football without phase 1/2 trials
4. There's absolutely no currently known drug that is near the cost-efficiency of vaccinations.

Third sentence is like: well, we could start with everyone getting vaccinated, FFS.

But hey, this guy "is an event manager and producer, with experience managing the biggest brand names and multi-million dollar campaigns" so he's gotta know what he's talking about, LOL.

https://amacfa.com

He looks like an absolute weapon [emoji15]

 

[User.45]

That's literally what it is. He's basically selling an image of professionalism with no real substance behind it. He hints towards the availability of a number of company specific iOS apps, but mentions none by name, or provides any links to the App Store. Shows shots of him in front of a camera, but has no portfolio detailing his work. If you want to find out more, he only provides you a link to his email.

...stuff like this really irks me. I have no idea why, but it does.

Well, he does have the ultimate indicator of multimillion dollar clients: a gmail account for contact.
Based on which it doesn't take genius to dig this masterpiece up:



And then you know that by more robustly designed [whatever] he meant hydroxychloroquine.