Congrats on the Mach-E, I think Ford built a super competent, and competitive BEV (we actually shopped those for a second car at one point).
Sorry, I did not buy a Mach-E. It looked like a decent choice otherwise, but that enormous screen hanging off the dash put me off. I seem to have bought a somewhat obscure EV from a well-recognized manufacturer: I have looked but have yet to see another one in the wild. In the past, when I got a new-to-me car, I started noticing them all the time, but this is different. I see Rivians and Mach-Es and Ioniq 5s and the thread-title brand all the time, but mine is not to be seen.
It kind of aggravated me with its numbers. I spent 3 days at my mom's house while it sat on 110 charging at level one (which works out to about 4 miles an hour) and left with 95%. It told me I had 42 miles
more range than the vehicle is rated for at 100%. And, of course, since there were a few more things in the back than I came with, I knew it would be an over-estimate.
It turned out I lost some 60 miles in range compared to the estimate, partly because I took a different route, but I still had plenty left. It just annoys me that the logic is not designed to be more conservative with its estimates.
Yesterday, I took out the dryer outlet that was in the garage and replaced it with the proper NEMA 14-50, allowing me to do level 2 at home, which is a pretty big improvement. It shows 250V across the clips, which is 10V more than the charger wants, but my expert friend told me that would not be a problem.