- Posts
- 7,582
- Reaction score
- 11,842
I think California would be in a good position. We’ve got tech, entertainment, agriculture, forestry, fossil fuels (I know, ick), and good global relationships. I think our main concern would be water.
The coast is a great asset too. Being a landlocked country would suck.I think California would be in a good position. We’ve got tech, entertainment, agriculture, forestry, fossil fuels (I know, ick), and good global relationships. I think our main concern would be water.
Plus we already have the 5th largest economy on the planet so there's that.I think California would be in a good position. We’ve got tech, entertainment, agriculture, forestry, fossil fuels (I know, ick), and good global relationships. I think our main concern would be water.
I think I've seen that movie. It's the one with Mel Gibson in the desert, right?I think some states would learn really quick what US federal socialism was when they are no longer receiving it. The same states would probably also have to shift to an unregistered gun based currency and the new established country government might have a different view on letting their citizens run amuck with firearms once the bleakness of their economy becomes apparent.
Lack of it, or being under it in 50 years?I think our main concern would be water.
CA is too mountainous to be completely submerged. FL on the other hand will probably be completely underwater by next Thursday.Lack of it, or being under it in 50 years?
Lack of it, or being under it in 50 years?
How does that song go? Water water all around, let’s all take a drink!Heh then there's Long Island, NY... where both are already a concern.
Nah I think it starting to go on Long Island more like :"water water all around but not a drop to drink."
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.