There were a few thousand of them in Washington DC with maybe tens of thousands more in the rest of the country. Hitler had a million in the SA out of 65 million Germans. The US doesn’t have 5 million oath keepers
www.chicagotribune.com
Doesn’t the constitution state they need to be in their desks for the trial?
Because this procedure is political, conducted by a political body, it is severely compromised from the start. There is no oversight to keep it on track. If half the Congress want to violate their oath of office in hearings like this, the only equalizer is not immediate, it is delayed judgement from the citizens and/or idiots from the home districts of representatives. If you can imagine, if we collectively elect anti-republic, anti-democratic people to represent us, we are voting for a change in our government for the good or bad depending on your perspective.
This is great!Column: At Trump impeachment trial, Democrats are rudely making an overwhelming case for conviction
As a proud Republican member of the U.S. Senate, I would like to formally express my disgust — disgust, I tell you! — at the way my Democratic colleagues are conducting themselves durin…
This is great!
As a proud Republican member of the U.S. Senate, I would like to formally express my disgust — disgust, I tell you! — at the way my Democratic colleagues are conducting themselves during this ridiculous, illegal, unfair and unconstitutional impeachment trial of Donald Trump, America’s forever president, blessed be his name.
As an impartial juror, my right to believe only what I want to believe is being trampled by these radical leftist Democrats. They keep shoving direct and consequential evidence in my face in a blatant attempt to get me to acknowledge what actually happened during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
The House impeachment managers know full well I have already impartially made up my mind that Trump is both innocent and handsome, yet they continue to rudely make an overwhelming case for conviction and belligerently force me to reckon with my own outlandish hypocrisy.
But... But... But her e-mails!?
And the fact that they have had to alter the audio and video on every clip they’ve used is also concerning. What in hell did they do to the video of Jerry Nadler? They somehow made him look like he weighed 300 pounds. And adding spooky music to the soundtrack? I believe that was to cover the real audio cause the actual audio was damning.
Trump lawyers keep accusing Democrats of manipulating evidence. But they’re doing that themselves.
Trump’s defense team is twisting words out of their context.www.vox.com
It's tragicomical. She's a newcomer and you can hear she's uncomfortable with the situation because of some rudimentary remnants of a spine. It's also ironic. If she's uncomfortable with it, she shouldn't go on MSNBC where she'd def. be confronted. And if she's confronted she shouldn't refer to precedent as something to define constitutionality. Sad and pathetic.Also, when you go on to discuss the impeachment and don't have a fricken clue & need talking points
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1359919631687954440/
...and you're a juror...
I don’t think what the Republicans do matters - see https://www.palmerreport.com/analysis/democrats-have-won-the-impeachment-trial-already/36563/
