Getting back on topic... what is the Republican agenda heading into the 2022 elections?
Is it taking over the Capitol with 4,000 “shock troops” perhaps?
Matt Gaetz in on a roll this week. After his Tuesday threat to "take power" after the 2022 election, he flexed his anti-democratic bravado again yesterday, on Steve Bannon's War…
boingboing.net
Funny how people get upset at the “extreme” members of the Democratic caucus who want things like universal healthcare. All the while, the extreme members of the GOP caucus are calling for armed revolution... and are becoming more mainstream every day.
On the other hand why are the media even covering this? It's a circus, a distraction, and a fundraiser...
It's absurd that the Rs would even need such maneuvers as Bannon and the Trump acolyte brigade are projecting. They've gotten the country's path forward exactly 180º off kilter from plausibility, and certainly by intent, since the very idea of a peaceful transition of government is anathema to them.
It would be massively disappointing to Bannon & friends if the run-up to the 2025 inauguration of whoever wins the 2024 election is peaceful -- regardless of name and party of the incoming President.
Look, the Dems were not happy (to say the least) when Trump won election the first time. I'm not talking about demonstrators in the public but about officials in the outgoing administration. Yet that Obama administration went to great pains to prepare one of the most thorough sets of transition briefings ever set up for an incoming American government. A peaceful transition was a given to them. A competent one was their mission.
But you can read
The Fifth Risk: Undoing Democracy (Michael Lewis) if you want to know how little that scrupulous interagency preparation for a peaceful and competent transition mattered to the feckless Trump.
For example, the agency briefers waited in vain for Trump's landing teams to show up at the scheduled meetings. They had even courteously set aside parking spaces near the agency offices. No one bothered to show up, for days in some cases and at all in others. In fact the Obama team eventually had to reach out in late January to a Bush administration official to come over and brief Wilbur Ross, Trump's nominee to head up Commerce. That guy tried to explain that Commerce was about way more than trade, it was also about the census, weather, climate science... its missions were about science and technology. Ross' reaction was 'Yeah I don't think I want to be focusing on that."
See, Donald Trump didn't get why he even needed a transition team. Mr. "I alone can fix it" had figured to wing it. Chris Christie is who pointed out to Trump and his campaign managers that by law the presidential candidates must mount a transition team. Trump then grumpily conceded the point and allowed fundraising for the purpose, but later screamed about transition managers stealing "his money".
But again, the FACTS are that the Dems lost the WH in 2016 and did what they were supposed to do, arranged for an orderly transition for the incoming Trump administration.
There is ZERO reason to assume that the current administration would not likewise prepare for orderly transition in the even of a 2024 loss. Zero.
More FACTS: It is not a bunch of Democrats who stormed the Capitol in 2021 trying to prevent any transition at all, Nor was it a bunch of Democrats in Congress who underwrote the idea of possibly overturning the 2020 election results instead of formalizing the 50 states' already certified vote totals on January 6.
Bannon and his merry band of anarchists seek airtime and money. They tilt at windmills related to a hazy 2024 even as the primary season for 2022 elections are actually at hand. Follow the money, dammit. The money is about 2022. Shame on media for covering Bannon's graphic novels about some other season.