The Republican Agenda 2021 and Forward

.....aaaaand we have Lindsey Graham still trying to baptize Joe Manchin in the name of the GOP, mentioning him 20 times in 27 minutes while talking about staving off the administration's build back program. Hope Biden has something better to offer Joe Manchin for West Virginia than just more name recognition.

https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1469381281876254722/
 
.....aaaaand we have Lindsey Graham still trying to baptize Joe Manchin in the name of the GOP, mentioning him 20 times in 27 minutes while talking about staving off the administration's build back program. Hope Biden has something better to offer Joe Manchin for West Virginia than just more name recognition.

https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1469381281876254722/
All that’s left is to make it official. He’s working for the GOP already.
 
A large container ship tried to do some fancy drifting in the Suez Canal – got stuck sideways, blocking all the other traffic from getting past. A lot of other traffic.

The is now talk of renaming the ship "The McConnell".

Nearly nine months later, get this: the same ship Ever Given, having been unstuck from the Suez after six days and then having gone on its way for some repairs, eventually turned up in China for new cargo, and now approaches the Suez again.


So to take two of "getting it right the first time," to assorted hilarious remarks (and a few side bets, probably) on social media. Supposedly there's no reason to think the Ever Given will end up sideways again and block more of the already bollixed delivery of Xmas goodies. The mystery will be resolved today if shipping schedules hold up.

If it does block passage again, we could rename it the Ever Lovin' Manchin now instead of The McConnell.
 
Herschel Walker is trending as well as his son. Herschel is trending because he's the latest unqualified celebrity that wants in on politics. His son is trending because he's rocking a $1300 hoodie & an iPhone bitching about the price of gas, as if that makes him identifiable.

https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1470131524104163328/

Kind of sums up the party as a whole. Can hardly wait for the complaints about the 'poors'.
 
Nearly nine months later, get this: the same ship Ever Given, having been unstuck from the Suez after six days and then having gone on its way for some repairs, eventually turned up in China for new cargo, and now approaches the Suez again.


So to take two of "getting it right the first time," to assorted hilarious remarks (and a few side bets, probably) on social media. Supposedly there's no reason to think the Ever Given will end up sideways again and block more of the already bollixed delivery of Xmas goodies. The mystery will be resolved today if shipping schedules hold up.

If it does block passage again, we could rename it the Ever Lovin' Manchin now instead of The McConnell.
I would have thought the ship would have gotten the hell fined out of it unless, it was not their fault the first time. :unsure:
 
I would have thought the ship would have gotten the hell fined out of it unless, it was not their fault the first time.

Hence the moniker "The McConnell", eh? Nothing ever his fault :LOL:

In reality, fault findings and settlements for damage on marine vessels are really complex and still get sorted out initially under very old "Admiralty Law". But there's already been a settlement between insurers, owners and the operator. Egypt relinquished the once-seized behemoth after the settlement, and was given a 75-ton tugboat meant for help with future Suez transit issues.

That does sounds like a Christmas tree ornament or "sweetener" on a defense appropriations bill, but whatever... it had the desired effect because the Egyptians didn't say no to another shot for the Ever Given this week.

Let's hope there's a Christmas ornament less expensive than a 75-ton tugboat that the Ds can round up for Joe Manchin, to keep him from becoming an actual Republican vote regarding the Build Back act's tenuous passage through the Senate.
 
With the audience the GOP plays to, it’s just too easy to keep the Con Roll’n. :oops:

Well it's not complicated. Whenever the feds have underwritten some project that's being celebrated, the photo op and TV news segments of the ribbon-cutting or groundbreaking ceremony are often focused on the state's governor or else a local official.

Sure, sometimes there's a federal official there, maybe a USDA or DOT agency representative, holding a big facsimile of a check made out to the state or county, etc. But the focus is on that local pol or governor, and he or she is saying that the state's Senator or Congressman has managed to extract something of all due value for hardworking taxpayers of the great state of [pick one], from among all that otherwise wasteful spending in DC.

Feels like governors, mayors and county supervisors all take Federal Disbursement Ceremony Management 101 after they're sworn in and before they step up for public receipt of the first big federal appropriation.

I hasten to say that this approach is not used solely by Republicans.
 
Last edited:
It’
Well it's not complicated. Whenever the feds have underwritten some project that's being celebrated, the photo op and TV news segments of the ribbon-cutting or groundbreaking ceremony are often focused on the state's governor or else a local official.

Sure, sometimes there's a federal official there, maybe a USDA or DOT agency representative, holding a big facsimile of a check made out to the state or county, etc. But the focus is on that local pol or governor, and he or she is saying that the state's Senator or Congressman has managed to extract something of all due value for hardworking taxpayers of the great state of [pick one], from among all that otherwise wasteful spending in DC.

Feels like governors, mayors and county supervisors all take Federal Disbursement Ceremony Management 101 after they're sworn in and before they step up for public receipt of the first big federal appropriation.

I hasten to say that this approach is not used solely by Republicans.
As any politician, it’s an absolute gutter play to take credit for something you opposed, that passed despite your efforts, and the dummies instead of questioning, maybe they they are oblivious of being scammed and applaud their hero. :oops:
 
Well it's not complicated. Whenever the feds have underwritten some project that's being celebrated, the photo op and TV news segments of the ribbon-cutting or groundbreaking ceremony are often focused on the state's governor or else a local official.

Sure, sometimes there's a federal official there, maybe a USDA or DOT agency representative, holding a big facsimile of a check made out to the state or county, etc. But the focus is on that local pol or governor, and he or she is saying that the state's Senator or Congressman has managed to extract something of all due value for hardworking taxpayers of the great state of [pick one], from among all that otherwise wasteful spending in DC.

Feels like governors, mayors and county supervisors all take Federal Disbursement Ceremony Management 101 after they're sworn in and before they step up for public receipt of the first big federal appropriation.

I hasten to say that this approach is not used solely by Republicans.

Reminds me of a podcast I heard stating that there is zero difference between crony capitalism and capitalism. Business colluding with government is capitalism. When you don’t like the industry that is doing it then you just tack “crony” on it.
 
Reminds me of a podcast I heard stating that there is zero difference between crony capitalism and capitalism. Business colluding with government is capitalism. When you don’t like the industry that is doing it then you just tack “crony” on it.

That works.

As any politician, it’s an absolute gutter play to take credit for something you opposed, that passed despite your efforts, and the dummies instead of questioning, maybe they they are oblivious of being scammed and applaud their hero. :oops:

The voters may indeed do that. Or maybe now they just shrug and mumble "they're all the same".

But it remains true that both parties work on bringing some amendments to the floor that may even pass but will definitely end up on the cutting room floor before a bill lands on the President's desk for signature. It's the stuff of substance for campaign ads.

Sure, pols can leave themselves open to those "He was for it before he was against it" accusations.

But those campaign ads are practically indistinguishable from the ones that claim credit for having voted for something that did land in a final bill, and if whatever amendment a candidate voted to include in a bill didn't make it, they just say something like "... and I'll never quit fighting for America" or whatever.

We're pretty gridlocked now for quite awhile (leaving out the problems on the horizon with this particular Supreme Court configuration), but it could still be worse, and both Ds and Rs should definitely think twice about trying to knock down pillars of what makes gridlock possible.

Gerrymandering in a problem in both parties, but the Rs in particular have shown they're not above engineering the ability to overturn elections right into their state laws about who gets to vote, who gets to count them and who gets to decide if the vote and the counts were fair. Still, any political party can be seen as having gone too far, including in manipulation of the electoral or judicial system, and when that happens, the effect of laws with an assumed party-in-power bias to them shifts like a load of cattle in a truck taking a dead man's curve too fast.
 
I hasten to say that this approach is not used solely by Republicans.
Given that the Republicans are the ones who consistently oppose spend two red cents, for the Democrats to take credit for a municipal-type project is rarely hypocritical.

Of course, a gosarian could claim, "I was voting against all that other wasteful spending, not this here wise use of funds", and might be able to get away with it.
 
Given that the Republicans are the ones who consistently oppose spend two red cents, for the Democrats to take credit for a municipal-type project is rarely hypocritical.

Of course, a gosarian could claim, "I was voting against all that other wasteful spending, not this here wise use of funds", and might be able to get away with it.

Yeah it's true that with Dems, the problem is often instead that who shows up for a photo op to get public credit for some grant is one of the state's two US Senators, hogging the camera and press writeup instead of credit going to a state senator or a US House rep whose office might have done a lot of the legwork to get the grant nailed down.
 
I took a longish break from MSNBC but this morning tuned in and OMG.
  • 6 members of Congress are being investigated for being complicit in the Jan6 attacks.
  • Mark Meadows being held in contempt of Congress while virtually all of the rank and file Republicans vote against it.
  • McConnell says in a non committal way, this will be interesting.
  • While rank and file Congressional Republicans also vote against everything associated with these attacks, Comgressman Banks (R) goes as far as to say this is what Americans see when Democrats are in charge (but he does not call it accountability) in an attempt to fool his dummies back home.
  • When it was happening, Hannity and Ingrams from Fox News implored Trump to intervene, but now, they are attacking the Committee. Hannity asking is there such a thing left in this country as privacy? (Regarding an attack on the Capitol?)
  • On a side note, Proud Boys are trying to get themselves voted onto school boards?
Know this, the above stuff is not an imagined boogey man and this is not politics as usual. Investigating an illegal physical attack on the Capitol building is what I would expect the Congress to do. The only reason something along the lines of accountability regarding a physical attack on the Capitol and Capitol Police is taking place is precisely because Democrats are calling the shots.

The GOP has displayed that when the Republicans retake Congress, they will whitewash any event that would harm their party. Accountability only matters when it harms the other side. :mad:
 
In the gym locker room on Wed I heard a conversation:
  • Those jackasses in New York want to give illegals the vote.
  • We’ve got to take it back.
  • Yea, I’m ready, just waiting for the word to come down.
I’m distinctly aware that this is not go out and vote talk, it is gun revolution talk. :mad: I’ve got 4 guns in the house, maybe it’s time to accumulate more ammo.
 
In the gym locker room on Wed I heard a conversation:
  • Those jackasses in New York want to give illegals the vote.
  • We’ve got to take it back.
  • Yea, I’m ready, just waiting for the word to come down.
I’m distinctly aware that this is not go out and vote talk, it is gun revolution talk. :mad: I’ve got 4 guns in the house, maybe it’s time to accumulate more ammo.

The real jackasses are the ones who don't understand we need immigration reform, not least to meet labor shortages, ensure the decent treatment of and fair wages for guest workers and provide a path to permanent residence for law abiding undocumented workers.

Some of those workers have been here working, paying taxes and improving local economies for decades, so it seems disingenuous to talk about how they should be deported because they're "trying to jump the line". How long do you have to pay into the system and not qualify for retirement benefits before you've paid any virtual dues for having jumped a line you didn't jump, just worked your ass off to survive the wait, same as the wait anyone with papers would endure, but for less security and less money? And with the blessing of the USA's pols and fans of cheap labor...

Their main fault is not theirs but an understaffed and messed-up immigration adjudication system, one that winks and nods at the existence of undocumented workers unless, after hiring, they turn up injured or sick or have the temerity to complain about wages or treatment... and then the employer of those undocumented works just shifts gears and calls ICE to get them deported, because he knows there are more can be rounded up from somewhere with a few more winks and nods to the right people.

It's shameful to wink at this stuff. It enables abuses like that recently uncovered in indictments covering some bad labor contractors in six counties in south Georgia where --for years!-- over a hundred immigrants had been effectively treated as slaves, even sometimes forced at gunpoint to finish onion harvests with bare hands, making 20c a bucket, living with food insecurity, inadequate shelter and sanitation.


Sure, not every undocumented worker ends up in such a hellhole, but none of us should imagine that our all-American life is free from reliance in some part on invisibly undocumented labor. It's not like we know where our Vidalia onions come from past being stacked in a supermarket... and so the same with people in NYC not having a clue who packs and unpacks boxes of stuff for markets and bodegas every day, or who sweeps up and takes out the trash or cleans toilets for that hole-in-wall diner or the places we brag about as a neighborhood go-to for world's best eggs and home fries or a vast number of ethnic dinner options.

I have no patience with right wingers carping about immigration issues when they're not also carping about how come Congress doesn't get off its wink-and-nod dime and get the reforms done. We had perhaps a best shot in decades at doing that during the Bush 43 administration, and yet his own side of the aisle shot it down.

Shame isn't even a good enough word for this stuff. I once thought we'd get the USA's immigration issues settled in my lifetime. Now I really wonder if a tolerance for exploitation and scapegoating has just settled permanently in American culture. The locker room talk you overheard doesn't make me feel more optimistic.
 
I took a longish break from MSNBC but this morning tuned in and OMG.
  • 6 members of Congress are being investigated for being complicit in the Jan6 attacks.
  • Mark Meadows being held in contempt of Congress while virtually all of the rank and file Republicans vote against it.
  • McConnell says in a non committal way, this will be interesting.
  • While rank and file Congressional Republicans also vote against everything associated with these attacks, Comgressman Banks (R) goes as far as to say this is what Americans see when Democrats are in charge (but he does not call it accountability) in an attempt to fool his dummies back home.
  • When it was happening, Hannity and Ingrams from Fox News implored Trump to intervene, but now, they are attacking the Committee. Hannity asking is there such a thing left in this country as privacy? (Regarding an attack on the Capitol?)
  • On a side note, Proud Boys are trying to get themselves voted onto school boards?
Know this, the above stuff is not an imagined boogey man and this is not politics as usual. Investigating an illegal physical attack on the Capitol building is what I would expect the Congress to do. The only reason something along the lines of accountability regarding a physical attack on the Capitol and Capitol Police is taking place is precisely because Democrats are calling the shots.

The GOP has displayed that when the Republicans retake Congress, they will whitewash any event that would harm their party. Accountability only matters when it harms the other side. :mad:
Imagine a world where this happened in Jan 2017, and BLM and the Woman's March stormed the capitol. AOC was found to have texted anyone that was a known member of one of those groups with "Who is this?"

There would have been public executions.
 
The real jackasses are the ones who don't understand we need immigration reform,

This is by design on the Republican side

A). More people here legally means less anger (other than from blatant racists)

B). They won't be able to scapegoat illegals as the cause of all the problems in this country.

However, as it's been proven that some on the right will believe any insane outrage trigger you throw at them, they could easily replace illegal immigrants with just about anything, no matter how far-fetched.

On that note, Alex Jones blames the recent tornadoes on weather weapons used by the Biden administration. I shit you not.
 
Back
Top