To repeat myself, by the AM after the election, the county-wide data projected a Biden win within a 1500 vote margin of error for GA, AZ, MI, WI, etc. So here are the consistencies:
1. Overall Trump over performed predictions in OH, FL, NC and TX, but the presidential outcomes of GA, AZ, MI, WI, PA were adequately predicted prior to the election.
2. If an election is stolen, why allow the senate majority hang on a GA second round?
3. Based on county-wide projections, the data had already fallen in place by the AM after the election.
4. This takes us to consistencies: if there are machines being hacked the cause, you would see variabilities and anomalous counts that are discrepant from the expectations based on demographics (and polling). So, for such consistencies to persist, you have to have access to the entire system evenly. That's like a pretty massive breach that would be much more likely to be picked up.
5. Mail-in ballot preferences were absolutely correlated to political preference given Trump's telling people to vote in person (in retrospect it was just plain stupid).
6. If mail-in ballots are problematic, why would they tell their voters to use them for GA's second round? They inadvertently legitimized mail-in ballots there.
At the end of the day if I wanted to assess irregularities I'd assess PA, where Dems really really outperormed projections (by 10,000s). Yet PA is interestingly not the focus. Wonder why....
My MR frenemy "a self-proclaimed liberal leaning neutral" (horse shit) whined about PA breaking its own constitution to expand voting. When I reminded him that A) PA's constitution has a health clause that is up for interpretation B) the expansion was voted for by a republican majority in PA's legislature C) it interestingly received no opposition within the timeframe of appeal, but only after Trump lost and thas was immediately thrown out by PA supreme court. His response: "it's still unconstitutional."
Now, I snooped this dude's social media and I think this really shows you a lot about this mindset:
Original tweet included a set of photos comparing the response to BLM vs. Capitol with a conclusion I 100% agree with. Dude's response below:
After seeing this tweet, I had to verify that he is indeed black. This was just the most absurd comment, but the conclusion was hilariously accurate. If just "asking" police worked, Floyd would still be alive, which takes us to how funny it is when somebody fails to comprehend this in the same post they are claiming the other has limited cognitive abilities. These inconsistencies in thought really makes me think about that this is a manifestation of mental health issues.
’s.
