You can get more bang for buck in terms of environmental win by using smaller batteries to make more hybrids than fewer pure EVs. Toyota reckons its like 37x
Zero disagreement on this point. But you can also carry it further in that you can get even bigger impacts with transit oriented city development (rail can be electrified without batteries, trolly buses can use electric power in downtown corridors while still being able to have flexible routes, etc, etc). On top of that, if you can develop something like what the Netherlands has achieved, then e-bikes or the like can carry that lithium even further.
even if people had EVs, many/most city dwellers have no charging capacity at home
Which is a fixable infrastructure problem, and I'd argue the fact that we just shrug at it as a market reality is the issue. I mean, consider how much time and energy we as a species poured into paving highways to usher in the car centric age we live in. With how much we have subsidized/encouraged car use, I don't find this a terribly
compelling argument against EVs in general, but more a statement of how much work we have in front of us.
Li-ion batteries are not economically viable to recycle and end in landfill
Recycling is probably a pipe dream here for sure. Re-use is another thing though. A battery that's lost 30% of it's capacity (NMC @ ~1000 cycles) may get tossed by someone wanting it in a car, but the flip side is that out of a 72kWh pack (my GV60), that's still 50kWh of potential grid or home storage where most of the cost has already been paid.
Industry in general is lying about just about everything. It is all a load of marketing. But EV batteries can last a lot longer than the naysayers want you to believe. There is a metric shit-ton of disinformation flying around out there.
Some of it is based on the Leaf, which is a first generation product which has zero thermal management of the battery. Thermal management helps a ton here (and would probably help mobile phones as well with how hot they can get these days), but is a relatively new phenomenon. That said, even if I assume 1000 cycles on my battery, at my usage of around 10k miles/year, it should still be ~16-20 years before my battery drops below 200mi range. But the calendar aging effects confounds this sort of estimate.
The ID.4 on the other hand is getting some interesting data on NMC batteries that include thermal management as owners are sharing data into a Google Sheets spreadsheet with battery age data pulled from the OBDII connection.
Here is how to get your battery health SoH number. You need an OBD dongle and the car scanner app (android or iOS.) read the Maximum energy content of the traction battery (MEC), and the battery min. temp. Degradation is the amount your battery MEC has dropped from new 77kwh for 2021-22 or...
www.vwidtalk.com
It shows an early trend that flattens as it approaches 90% of the original capacity. These cars are holding at ~90% capacity after 4 years or 100,000 miles which is good. LFP batteries should be able to hold ~4x longer (although only Tesla is currently using them due to their unrepairable structural battery pack letting them pack more cells in). Maybe in a decade we'll be able to reap the benefits of real world data on these improved battery systems.