Definitely. On paper it must have seemed to all be in place for a smash and grab invasion.
1. Covid, the world's attention is off the ball, exhausted and financial resources stretched;
2. Biden perceived as a weak US President;
3. New unproven German Chancellor Olaf Scholz;
4. Pfeffel Johnson, a Clown for a UK PM;
5. Xi Jinping assured as a sleeping ally;
6. Russian military, obviously glossing over their own parlous state of affairs.
Extra card?
Trump's dealings with Putin.
What could possibly go wrong?
Right. Well aside from Murphy's Law, of course. But Putin has forgotten that living in a bubble full of sycophants is a recipe for inflation of perceived power coupled with erosion of real capability to lead effectively. Too bad for Ukraine, Europe, Russia itself and the rest of the planet that it's taking so long for the cocoon he's ended up in to come apart and reveal not a butterfly but a shriveled larva.
That said, bubbles don't usually manage to keep autocrats free of concerns about loyalty of associates and subordinates. I don't think Putin assumes he's invulnerable; he's clearly paranoid about even his inner circle. The media are casting his very recent purges in the FSB as the tip of his blame-game, but there's more to it than pointing at perceived intel failures, surely. He likely regards some of his lack of good informaton as a treasonous personal betrayal, and may be angry that he exercised his power to gloss over some of the FSB scandals of recent years as well.
None of it bodes well for Putin's ability to view his miscalculations rationally, so to construct an exit that can be described as a victory to his countrymen. He needs a way to save face and go home already. His lackeys haven't the imagination for it. Maybe Xi can help him find a way to frame a retreat as appropriate after, say, "having rid Ukraine of the troublemakers" or whatever.
It's all so messed up --for the planet!-- and in combination with the aftereffects of covid and the sanctions, will remain so for decades no matter what happens now. It's callous but true to suggest (as some media pieces are already doing) that Ukrainian cities, airports, bridges and roads can be rebuilt, even as each death is now and will be forever mourned by family, friends, Ukrainian political leaders. But rebuilding and mourning alone do not heal the past, they paper it over so whoever is left behind after war can summon the will to go on living.
The thing is, the infuriating thing is, that this did not have to happen. Or did it? Anyway here we are and it's history in the making again and for historians to say later whatever historians say when it's time to revisit history made yet again. Commentary, always commentary, but no answers because those best qualifed to ask the questions are dead. I am reminded of Randall Jarrell's poem "Losses"... closing lines of which are below:
We read our mail and counted up our missions—
In bombers named for girls, we burned
The cities we had learned about in school—
Till our lives wore out; our bodies lay among
The people we had killed and never seen.
When we lasted long enough they gave us medals;
When we died they said, “Our casualties were low.”
They said, “Here are the maps”; we burned the cities.
It was not dying —no, not ever dying;
But the night I died I dreamed that I was dead,
And the cities said to me: “Why are you dying?
We are satisfied, if you are; but why did I die?”