A federal judge yesterday demanded that the USPS sweep 2 dozen district offices looking for misplaced ballots, which the postal service refused to do. The USPS has conceded that it was not processing mail at the normal rate. A judge is holding a hearing in Georgia as I type.
Yeah they claimed they didn't have enough inspectors to get it done in the timeframe... so hey the way to solve that is extend the timeframe for legit delivery of absentee votes. That demand can be taken to court by the Dems. It's hardball time for the guys wearing blue pinstripes too, not just for the actors with GOP lawyers.
As for the rest of us, now consigned to vote-counting-watch as a spectator sport, well honestly everyone was told up front and given details in god knows how many links that counting mailed-in ballots could take
weeks in some cases. It took weeks in NYS during the June primaries this year...
So we should take the advice that was handed out in advance by boards of election all over the country:
be patient, please... and expect lawyers to get a lot of exercise while we wait.
I mean there are ballots that by longstanding election laws in some states that can still be accepted for counting if they arrive in almost mid-November. And lots of states including NY have laws saying absentee ballots are counted AFTER in person voting ends and can't even be opened ahead of that time.
Sure, those may not enough to tip a presidency, but they all count towards the victory of one or another elective office, and someone went to the trouble to fill out the ballot and send it back in, and the various states acknowledge that in their election laws --and some states will take affadavits and ballots from in person voters and check the poll registry later to make sure an absentee ballot was in fact not received and counted. All this gets bipartisan scrutiny from the election inspectors... So there's a certain level of street theatre going on with some of the challenges being mounted now by the GOP regarding "late" absentee/mailed ballots.
Some states did recently change their election laws to accommodate concerns over covid-19. For the GOP to be in court now challenging not just "late" ballots but the rule changes that made them timely -- the changes meant to keep people safe from covid-19 exposure while exercising their right to vote and acknowledging a potential disruption of usual ability to process far smaller numbers of mailed votes-- is certainly evidence to me that we need to revisit the Voting Rights Act.
Weird that SCOTUS recently chopped out of the VRA the requirement to have certain mostly southern states be federally overseen w/ respect to any changes in voting laws. In my opinion the Roberts court was wrong about how we no longer need that oversight. Anyone who delves into the details of Georgia vote suppression could see that without difficulty. Whole studies have been done on vote suppression in that state alone.
Here's info on one.
Anyway now it looks like it's not just in the South that the GOP is interested in voter suppression... they are still trying to swat legit absentee votes into foul ball territory by taking exception to local election rule changes specifically designed for this election's unusual and health-related circumstances.