I'd like to see a grass roots movement (actually regardless of who wins) that aims to have a reoccurring dialogue from all sides including the far right and far left (probably not the extremes) where everybody is allowed to articulate their concerns and values and see how that can be respected and integrated but with a willingness to compromise. I'd also like to hear how those viewpoints were formed. Was if personal experience? Was it family? Was it media? Geographical differences and related concerns would also be a good topic. Also not in a debate atmosphere but where counter views can be discussed. Basically, the establishment's worse nightmare.
It can be done but takes some ground rules about distinct "seasons" of the process: first the brainstorming where all ideas can go on the table and no one gets to shut something down because some "third rail" / "sacred cow" item looks to be getting a turn in the barrel... and only later on comes the winnowing out, with talk of economic feasibility and how political will and potlical capital figure into the picture.
Right now first thing happens is someone says "let's do XYZ because yada yada" and someone slams a newspaper on the table and says are u f'g crazy the insurance companies / gun lobby / right wing / Democrats / seniors / White House / oil patch / tree huggers will never go for that, fuhgeddaboudit.
Or taking it to the town council level, someone says "Nah, Jack won't like that" and that's the end of it bc Jack owns the vacant lot across from the local Dollar Store and someone else has proposed a village garden or a motorbike repair shop or something and Jack always figured that could be turned into a parking lot.
We have to get to where no one is "cancelled" because they uttered a sentence with a hot button word in it from the wrong side of all these damn fences we've allowed to be put up.
The only way progressives, conservatives, moderates, establishment types are going to get a real seat at one table together is for no one to have the right to cancel someone else's idea at brainstorming session.
To agree not to winnow out any ideas as unsuitable in the first ten seconds... ok, it's hard.
Everyone at this point has certain almost reflexive "cancellation" impulses when they hear partisan trigger words related to US policy. But we can retrain ourselves if we really care to re-establish effectively democratic negotiations on policy and on appropriations related to policy decisions.
This stuff is starting to happen at local government levels in the past few years as progressives have won some elections and tried to get councils and town halls to be more inclusive even against their own inclinations, i.e. not really wanting to listen to conservative old fogies after managing to win a couple seats on the council, but doing it anyway. It's not easy but change is still possible. I'll never vote for another Republican as long as I live after experiences of the past 12 years especially... but I'm willing to listen to current conservative officials' ideas about improving a town's functionality or appearance etc.