Thing is, you gotta bend over extremely far to be that fair, perhaps so far it isn't fair.If we're bending over backwards to be fair, 18A is the first node meant for customers at volume and so we could say that the success or failure of Intel's latest attempt to be a foundry is currently unknown. Previously they attempted to be a foundry without abandoning the internal tools that Intel chip designers used to make their own chips and the result was predictably a disaster as customers were using a different set of tools than what the foundry was designed to use.
LR Trust, an Intel shareholder, has filed a lawsuit related to the performance of Intel Foundry and against former and current executives as well as directors of the company (as discovered by The Register). The lawsuit accuses Pat Gelsinger, the former chief executive of Intel, and David Zinsner, an interim co-CEO and CFO of Intel, of mismanagement, misleading disclosures, and demanding the return of their compensations and other gains to the company.
Always hard to tell in these derivative suits. Misleading disclosures would be the strongest claim, if true.How seriously should this lawsuit be taken?
Intel ex-CEO Gelsinger and current co-CEO slapped with lawsuit over Intel Foundry disclosures — plaintiffs demand Gelsinger surrender salary earned
LR Trust wants Pat Gelsinger and David Zinsner to return their compensation.www.tomshardware.com
Is asking for the CEO's compensation back a typical penalty to ask for? I'm not sure I've seen that before, but I don't follow a lot of these types of lawsuits too closely.Always hard to tell in these derivative suits. Misleading disclosures would be the strongest claim, if true.
no, i haven’t seen that re: normal compensation but I have seen attempts to claw-back post-job compensation (i.e. the payouts the CEO gets when he leaves)Is asking for the CEO's compensation back a typical penalty to ask for? I'm not sure I've seen that before, but I don't follow a lot of these types of lawsuits too closely.
"We knew we built a great part. We didn't know the competitor [Intel] had built a horrible one," quipped AMD executive Frank Azor. "So the demand has been a little higher than we forecasted."
We found the patch does nothing to help (at least on two motherboards) and that the newer Windows revision required for the fix has benefited competing processors more, thus making Intel's Arrow Lake competitive positioning even worse than at launch. We'll publish that testing soon.
A successful launch for Intel:
Intel Arc B580 sells out amid high demand; weekly restocks planned
Intel's Arc B580 "Battlemage" GPU has become a surprise hit, selling out quickly at $250. With 12GB VRAM and competitive performance against RTX 4060 and RX 7600, it marks a turnaround for Intel's graphics division after previously losing its entire market share. Weekly restocks are planned to...www.notebookcheck.net
The B580 is getting good reviews, is at a good price point, and is reportedly selling out - and is doing so because of high demand rather than low supply. As the article says, it may be a rare bright spot in and otherwise pretty bad year for Intel, but it’s a win nonetheless.
The full review of Intel’s “fixes” is out and it’s pretty damning.Altera officially spun back out of Intel - is still owned by Intel until the seemingly inevitable IPO.
Altera officially announces independence from Intel — the company strives to expand FPGA portfolio
But it is still an Intel company.www.tomshardware.com
AMD says Intel's 'horrible product' is causing Ryzen 9 9800X3D shortages
Team Blue in the rearview.www.tomshardware.com
AMD taking a victory lap over Intel saying demand for their 3D V-cache gaming processors is not just due to them having a great product, but Intel having an especially bad one.
Ouch.
Also Intel’s “fixes” for Arrow Lake do nothing and recent Windows updates make AMD look even better.
These tactics and the test results make this whole 'fix' exercise feel more like simple misdirection and spin than an actual fix.
At the end of the day, Intel’s fixes for its various failings did not demonstrably ‘fix’ the Core Ultra 9 285K’s gaming performance in any meaningful way, and they certainly aren't enough to meet the company’s original marketing claims or change the competitive positioning of its lackluster Arrow Lake chips. In fact, it looks like Arrow Lake is moving backward. Despite its other positive attributes, the Core Ultra 285K simply isn’t the best option for gaming.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.