The Republican Agenda 2021 and Forward

Truth be told I am starting to focus less on today's candidates --circus acts or otherwise-- and more on the largely still under-radar effort of the far right to gather enough red state legislative power to force the calling of a constitutional convention... hoping to install new rules of the road that enshrine "conservative" minority views of American governance.

The Guardian ran a big piece about it today, rounding up info on some of the movers and shakers at the level far below attention of most of the public, and noting that it only takes 34 states to call for a constitutional convention. In 2022, the Rs control legislatures of 30 states.


The 2010 Citizens United decision of course has unleashed tons of money into our politics and the worst part of it is how easy it is to dodge disclosure laws, weakened as they already are. Lot of big corporations and individuals are willing to back constitutional revisions to prevent --indeed to outlaw-- progressive federal legislation meant to narrow wealth gaps and work towards ideals of equality under rule of law. They basically want to ditch business regulation and inconveniences of workers' rights, antidiscrimination laws, and even the federal income tax.

The biggest problem is that most Americans actually have no idea what the federal government does for us every single day. Weather data (optimum crop planting and harvesting windows), small town water systems, hazardous waste cleanups... any monies the feds disburse to states as block grants commonly get claimed by state pols to be largesse that they and colleagues at state level have achieved on citizens' behalf. The typical red state pol's maneuver is to vote against the federal spending bills and then claim credit for whatever benefit accrues to his own state.

And there's precious little pushback from mayors or city councils who are just happy they finally got this or that grant to get something done to help ensure their own grip on power. It's part of the reason our public school system has gone down the tubes. States can decide to build privatized prisons instead of bumping per-student expenditures with some of their block grants. Property tax hikes get nixed as replacement funds for educational purposes. The block grant hides many decisions that are not in the public's interest, not least blurring outcomes as to source of the money. EVERYONE likes a tax cut, right? Maybe not if we saw where what's left in fed money ends up in some states.

The people now calling for a constitutional convention are pretty sure nobody's really paying attention.
 
I realize this may not concern the younger contingent here, but for those of us closing in on SS and Medicare age, this possibility is extremely worrisome.

https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1582399230341050373/
What is the GOP's motivation for attacking programs that help so many ordinary Americans? Are they inherently cruel people who enjoy harming others? Do they really believe the small government rhetoric (given that family values, strict constitutionalism and law and order have been shown to be empty slogans)? Or is it simply a matter of them protecting their wealthy sponsors from possibly having to pay a few dollars more in taxes, or pay taxes at all?
 
Or is it simply a matter of them protecting their wealthy sponsors from possibly having to pay a few dollars more in taxes, or pay taxes at all?

That is the principle. Greed is a good thing, which has driven socio-economic progress, providing us with all our nice iThings and automobiles and keurigs, but we need slaves workers to keep the system working properly so that the most successful among us can succeed even more. Hence, the lesser among us need to have their niceties that have just been handed over on a platter taken away from them so that they will be motivated to strive forthem and make our system more of a success. Oh, and more police, to insure that the lesser among us stay in their proper place.
 
What is the GOP's motivation for attacking programs that help so many ordinary Americans? Are they inherently cruel people who enjoy harming others? Do they really believe the small government rhetoric (given that family values, strict constitutionalism and law and order have been shown to be empty slogans)? Or is it simply a matter of them protecting their wealthy sponsors from possibly having to pay a few dollars more in taxes, or pay taxes at all?

It is no accident that in nominating Trump for re-election in 2020, the Republicans for the first time did not articulate a policy platform. Their single organizing principle became and until further formal restatement remains simply "Trump's our guy."

Henry Olsen, a conservative columnist for the Washington Post, took the occasion of the resignation of Liz Truss from leadership of the UK government --and the now dire state of the Tory party-- to warn US Republicans that they run the parallel risk nowadays of allowing Trump to end up having trashed the GOP's future, not least because the guy at base has neither ideology, character nor vetted policy proposals,


It's worth a read at least by those on the left, since at least the pols on the right who SHOULD read it may not bother if still in a pre-midterms pro-Trump bubble.

The GOP’s midterm messaging focuses on inflation, crime and immigration, but the party is not telling the public much about what it would do to combat those ills. That might be good politics, but it also means they would have no mandate for significant departures from the status quo. Using the national debt limit next year as leverage to force significant spending cuts, including to Social Security and Medicare, as has recently been rumored, would be as politically disastrous for the GOP as Truss’s supply-side tax cuts were for the Tories.

Republicans need to pick a 2024 nominee who has both intellectual depth and genuine courage. Former president Donald Trump has neither. He might sound like a fighter, but he regularly pulled back from his agenda under pressure from his staff. He also publicly excoriated Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), whom he will need to pass whatever agenda he comes up with. Much as Truss tried to brush aside dissenters within her own party rather than bring them to her side, Trump and his loyalists deride Republicans who don’t fall into line as RINOs who should be expelled. That’s recklessness, not courage.

Trump also shares Truss’s lack of serious engagement with ideas. Both have pulled 180-degree turns in their careers, switching political parties and reversing themselves on policy commitments when it suited their ambitions. It’s revealing that Trump did not sanction a party platform in his 2020 renomination bid, the first time the party ever failed to issue an updated set of principles and proposals. You can’t change the nation’s course if you don’t have an idea for where it should be going.

Truss’s ideological fecklessness has brought the Conservative Party to its knees. Republicans, take note.
 
What is the GOP's motivation for attacking programs that help so many ordinary Americans? Are they inherently cruel people who enjoy harming others? Do they really believe the small government rhetoric (given that family values, strict constitutionalism and law and order have been shown to be empty slogans)? Or is it simply a matter of them protecting their wealthy sponsors from possibly having to pay a few dollars more in taxes, or pay taxes at all?

Even when I was a kid, I kept hearing rhetoric from the GOP about how Social Security was insolvent, would bankrupt the country, etc, etc. This is a not a new platform, but has been part of their austerity politics for decades. There was a Bush era idea to allow individuals to contribute to private accounts instead of Social Security, which if it sounds a lot like private school vouchers in that it would defund social security in favor of private investment funds: why yes, it is. Goldwater and Regan both suggested that Social Security be made voluntary, and the Regan administration attempted numerous cuts to Social Security in the 80s.

This is probably one of the few planks left in the GOP platform that has been around my whole lifetime.
 
This is probably one of the few planks left in the GOP platform that has been around my whole lifetime.
Which makes it even more illogical that they continue to be supported by people who depend or will depend on the programs under attack. Due to the continuing culture wars promulgated by the GOP, those people fear the "radical, extreme Left," the "invasion" at our border and the Democrats' alleged softness on crime more than they regard their own financial solvency.
 
Which makes it even more illogical that they continue to be supported by people who depend or will depend on the programs under attack. Due to the continuing culture wars promulgated by the GOP, those people fear the "radical, extreme Left," the "invasion" at our border and the Democrats' alleged softness on crime more than they regard their own financial solvency.

It’s one reason the party has had a hard time dismantling it so far, instead just trying to sabotage it so it becomes an unpopular program. They want to make changes to *make* it insolvent so they can call it a failed program and get rid of it. Much like their approach to the ACA.

But it is a symbol of the “welfare state” that the GOP has rallied against for a while. The rhetoric is that it is expensive, your money, etc. That ”you” will have more money to retire with if the government wasn’t taking it all for government bloat. For many working class folks, Social Security is *the* tax they pay.

No, it doesn’t make sense to me either, but at least 20 years ago, the rhetoric was more coherent and tried to make an argument. Now it’s just the policy distilled without even the rhetoric to back it up.
 
The GOP has been ragging on SS so long that those that first heard their rhetoric are benefitting from it now. If they think younger folk will be hurt as long as their benefits continue, it may eventually be destroyed by the GOP if they take over the House and/or Senate. They will have to maintain control and win the presidency in 2024 to have a real chance of killing/mortally wounding SS though.

Without SS so many old folks would be in poverty, fighting on their own.
 
This has gone semi-viral, call to arms from the federalist society, the American ISIS. The only difference is their soldiers fly the confederate flag on thier holy war trucks and their lower level shot callers remain largely unaware of who their top level manipulators are because they would appear suspiciously elite. If anybody thinks this is a fringe group, all the conseratives on the Supreme Court would disagree and most are card carrying members.

 
This has gone semi-viral, call to arms from the federalist society, the American ISIS. The only difference is their soldiers fly the confederate flag on thier holy war trucks and their lower level shot callers remain largely unaware of who their top level manipulators are because they would appear suspiciously elite. If anybody thinks this is a fringe group, all the conseratives on the Supreme Court would disagree and most are card carrying members.

I just skimmed though this, what was said about transgender spouted ignorance and intolerance. But ok, stop calling yourself conservatives, start calling yourself self serving, hypocritical, one way, Right Wing Christian Crusaders on a mission tasked by your illusion in the sky.
 
I agree they need to stop calling themselves "conservative". If anything, I'm more conservative that these radical reactionary revolutionaries. They are calling for a complete overhaul of society. They represent chaos and disorder.

Not only that, they are way out ahead of the curve of the ordinary conservatives they imagine they are somehow leading. This because most ordinary conservatives, of which there are still many, are not all hanging out on Twitter reading links in the retweets of elitist right wing bloggers of the Federalist Society.

These guys sound like they're ramping up to bring Mussolini 2.0 not directly to the Beltway but to every state capitol and legislature in the USA, then somehow from there to a "party of the state" in.... yeah: good ol' Washington DC. Hard pass!

Nonetheless what's going on at state levels doesn't exactly gainsay their prospects.

William F. Buckley Jr. must be spinning in his grave. Sure, he also had a very good education, believed in God and was a man with strong political convictions. He also had two feet on the ground and understood that his American opinions were, well.. . his American opinions.

Edit: typo.
 
Last edited:
Sure. Hopefully it will be acknowledged that is his right and privilege against self incrimination. And captured on video.
That didn't appear to soften approval of Dear Leader among his followers. It will just be portrayed as a radical left attempt to smear a decent, upstanding member of the Republican party and he wasn't going to participate in it.
 
That didn't appear to soften approval of Dear Leader among his followers. It will just be portrayed as a radical left attempt to smear a decent, upstanding member of the Republican party and he wasn't going to participate in it.
I think it could play well. Especially captured on video.

Fanni Willis: Sen. Graham is it true that you contacted <Mr. ...> and talked about <fill in the blank with Question 1>?
Graham: I assert my 5th Amendment privilege.
Fanni Willis: Sen. Graham, are you asserting your 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination?
Graham: Mutters a "yes" or something.

Repeat above loop inserting Questions 2 through 30...


I'm just spitballing, and have no idea if the above could/would happen. There must be some number of conservative/Republican followers who are sick to death of trump and other weasels getting away with shit.
 
Back
Top