Just saw someone walking down the road in west San jose in a kilt. Didn’t check for pockets.When I went to the Apple Store to get my iPad restored (locked out because I could not get my new 6-digit passcode right), there was an employee there (male) wearing a utilikilt.
I’ve always been surprised that more men didn’t take to wearing skirts. This may be the solution. Women are forever complaining about the lack of pockets in our clothes. Figures men would get pockets in skirts before women.When I went to the Apple Store to get my iPad restored (locked out because I could not get my new 6-digit passcode right), there was an employee there (male) wearing a utilikilt.
Women have had pocketed skirts since at least the 1950s, IIUC. It may not be hugely common but they are definitely out there. The convenient thing about pcokets is that you have to empty them when changing clothes, so they do not become the lost-garbage collections that are purses. The annoying thing about pockets is that you have to move all your crap into the thing you are changing to. Like purses (or sporrans) they are kind of a mixed bag.I’ve always been surprised that more men didn’t take to wearing skirts. This may be the solution. Women are forever complaining about the lack of pockets in our clothes. Figures men would get pockets in skirts before women.
Watched for 10 seconds and changed the channel. Just can't do it.Trump is giving his usual dreadful speech. It feels like his presidential announcement, but even more depressing. It’s like a Breitbart avatar onstage.
His speech is a minute in, full of the usual hyperbole and lies…
This is really the path republicans want to continue on?
Watched for 10 seconds and changed the channel. Just can't do it.
It’s a rarity though. Same with dresses, and even dress slacks.Women have had pocketed skirts since at least the 1950s, IIUC.
This really should be no surprise coming from the accusation confession party that frequently uses “slippery slope” as a reason for obstruction, but you really have to marvel at the rate of their legislation, or attempted legislation, on things like gun control, LGBTQ rights, abortion, and education. They’re already penning a ramp up before the ink is even dry on their most recent related legislation. It’s not even a slippery slope. It’s a skydive without a parachute.
man free speech just went out of the window. government limiting free speech anyone? time to use big time.So, Tennessee just voted to expel two democrat house members. Their big crime was breaking decorum by participating in a gun control rally. They voted to expel two, but not the third. The two expelled were young black men, the one who was spared her seat was a white woman, and she was the first one to tell you she was saved because she was white. She’s an ally of the other two and a prominent progressive member of the house.
What a joke. The whole thing is a joke. Hopefully this bites them in the polls, though I doubt they’ll get the message if it does, they’ll just claim voter fraud.
man free speech just went out of the window. government limiting free speech anyone? time to use big time.
They want government small enough to fit in a womb.I sometimes hear republicans use the phrase “big government”, but less so than usual. “Get the government out of our lives” is also a less-repeated refrain by conservatives, who want to legislate genitalia, wombs, the bedroom, classrooms, libraries, or people who dress in drag (which is not related to sexuality, as there are many straight and cisgender people who participate. Probably many conservatives as well).
Except for certain ones, such as can afford to have it extracted, as needed, because, you know, they must not find out that I am the hypocrite.They want government small enough to fit in a womb.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.