rdrr
Elite Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2020
- Posts
- 1,739
- Main Camera
- Sony
Not sure if I should put this little turd in here or the GOP thread. Believing that this all stems from the MAGA crazies, I have leaned to place it here.
I swear that the MAGA 2.0 hat should be tin-foil silver color.Why the f*ck would there need to be a "covert government effort" to get a pop start to say "Hey, I like this guy, lets vote for him"? She's a big star and can say whatever she wants about who she's voting for or who she encourages others to vote for. Why is there a mystery? Did Bill Barr pull DOJ strings to get Ted Nugent to endorse Trump, or is that just a slimeball openly and freely endorsing another? No mystery needed.
The 1 in 3 numbers lines up perfectly with the percentage of the GOP base who are diehard Trump supporters, so not surprising
they will be on eBay when people realize they got ripped off then they can buy them at a discountRight now, there is some poor redneck fawning over those shoes like a poor kid does a new video game system, knowing they can’t afford it, nobody will get it for them, but they can dream anyways.
While the rest of laugh in amusement and disbelief, someone else really wishes they had the money to pony up for those ridiculous looking pieces of overpriced garbage.
That, my friends, is what TDS is.
Little does he know everything trump sells deflates in value in fast now they are worth .99
View attachment 28394
Little does he know everything trump sells deflates in value in fast now they are worth .99
View attachment 28394
all they are magic you put them on and your life turns to shit.Trump’s signature isn’t worth 9k. His shoes aren’t worth 9k. I suppose they could be the ultimate relic of stupidity and of a real-life Hanna-Barbera cartoon villain. In that sense, they may be worth something one day. Put them in a container and stash them away to give to your kids, and hopefully they will rise in value to at least cover the cost of their Starbuck’s in a few years time.
Which leads us to to an issue if these people breed, but that’s another issue altogether.
I bet .99 always the fucking gold. he is obsessed with gold. thats part of why his casino failed he bedazzled the shit out of it and it made it way too expensive.I have to wonder what the quality is. My gut tells me that these are probably the cheapest, crappiest shoes they could lay their hands on. Just add a coat of paint, a little Bedazzling, an endorsement from a well-known criminal and a massive price tag. I bet they'd fall apart within weeks if you actually wore them. That's just a guess of course. I wouldn't pick them up second hand at a Goodwill for $0.99, so I'll never know for sure. But I can't imagine them being quality shoes. No way a crook is going to part with any profits he doesn't need to part with voluntarily.
Hey those shoes will make it easier to identify the law breakers.
I don’t understand what is going on in Georgia. The Fulton county case, at least in theory, seemed to be one of the strongest and most serious cases against Trump.
Willis and Wade have totally f****ed up this case. Their recent hearings have demonstrated they not credible at all and are liars. And it seems they have perjured themselves and likely participated in corruption (and this may only be the top of the iceberg for Willis).
Sorry, no one is buying that both these people deal with thousands (maybe 10’s of thousands) in cash yet have no record of deposits, withdrawals, or an alternative source of all this money.
Even if we generously presume there was no corruption in play, the optics of this case destroy the credibility of the prosecutors. They appear to be liars who have lied under oath. Law enforcement must act with the upmost integrity and should be held to the highest of standards.
I believe the charges against Trump and his alleged co-conspirators to be credible and serious. I don’t understand why there is such a fight to keep Willis and Wade on this case. They should be replaced and frankly should have been taken off the case long ago. The optics of this case are atrocious and I see no benefit of unrolling the ugly details while the clock for 2024 is ticking.
I must say the defense of Willis in particular has been amusing to watch. MSNBC hosts offering ridiculous praise of her testimony. Her angry, obstinate attitude praised as strength and courage (ironically the same characteristics they condemned Brett Kavenough for having and they interpreted as guilt). And the hosts looping her gratuitous negative comments against Trump while calling the opposing lawyers “Trumps lawyers” (they are not) clearly knowing nothing about the case. Only for the next morning their actual legal expert to remark the next morning Willis’ testimony was disastrous and a bleak outlook. A conclusion seemingly shared by most legal experts in the liberal media well beforehand.
I mention this to highlight the dishonesty expressed and alternative reality created by our media. This pathology only promotes ridiculous, misguided ideas.
Like people should fervently defend a Fanni Willis & Friends I guess for political reasons because she’s prosecuting Trump… rather than firing these corrupt people (who evidently think they are far smarter than they are) and finding respectable prosecutors to handle one of the most important cases ever. Why continue to protect and defend people who have destroyed their ability to prosecute this case? They are not special, they can be replaced.
IF THIS IS SUCH AN ESSENTIAL CASE (which I believe it to be) WHY HAS THIS CLOWN SHOW BEEN ALLOWED TO OCCUR AND CONTINUE?
And I have to ask, why did it take 3 years for Willis to bring the indictment? Surely it doesn’t take 3 years to build a case where the prime evidence is a recorded phone call they’ve had all along.
I have to assume these prosecutors will be removed. Trump’s wish the case will be dropped entirely I find unlikely. But unfortunately it’s hard to imagine this will be resolved any time soon.
And I have to ask, why did it take 3 years for Willis to bring the indictment? Surely it doesn’t take 3 years to build a case where the prime evidence is a recorded phone call they’ve had all along.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.