This is so true. It means the wealthy are free to pay for whatever crimes they want to commit, while the poor will go to jail for the same behavior. That is exactly what we’re seeing now.Farron Cousins put it this way:
If the punishment for a crime is a fine, then that means, it is legal for a fee.
The legal system is painfully slow; have a seat and grab your handy haversack full of popcorn and sandwiches.
That was funSo much this. The wheels on the Prenda Law episode a while back turned slowly, but it was entertaining to watch. (More than this is)
Do you mean for violating his gag orders or for when he's convicted of felonies? I'd say near zero for the former and unlikely for the latter. I don't see Trump being thrown into prison because of the challenges related to his Secret Service detail and other considerations. Some type of house arrest would be more likely. Either way, an orange jumpsuit would match his face.I am still puzzled. How are the odds that he is going to jail like he should?
Do you mean for violating his gag orders or for when he's convicted of felonies? I'd say near zero for the former and unlikely for the latter. I don't see Trump being thrown into prison because of the challenges related to his Secret Service detail and other considerations. Some type of house arrest would be more likely. Either way, an orange jumpsuit would match his face.
I bet being convicted of so many crimes will remove his protected status. save the tax payers huge amounts of money.Do you mean for violating his gag orders or for when he's convicted of felonies? I'd say near zero for the former and unlikely for the latter. I don't see Trump being thrown into prison because of the challenges related to his Secret Service detail and other considerations. Some type of house arrest would be more likely. Either way, an orange jumpsuit would match his face.
Agree. Trump relies on repeating something over and over so it sinks into his deplorables' heads like it's true. Democrats should be countering him every step of the way. Example - "The Presidential Records Act let me do it." No it doesn't, in fact it's the opposite of what he says.Democrats aren’t doing enough to beat it into the heads of people this stuff is foul...
Yep. I've been saying the same thing. It should be, when they go low, we go lower to undermine them — not by lying, but pointing out their lies and how little they've done to improve the lives of average Americans. I don't think Trump will agree to a debate if he's the nominee, but if he does, I hope Biden can call out any time Trump lies (which will be often).Agree. Trump relies on repeating something over and over so it sinks into his deplorables' heads like it's true. Democrats should be countering him every step of the way. Example - "The Presidential Records Act let me do it." No it doesn't, in fact it's the opposite of what he says.
I may have missed it, but has Biden ever come out forcefully denying and denouncing all the talk about his "corruption," about how he's supposedly directing the Justice Department to go after Trump?
No more "When they go low we go high." That philosophy got Trump elected.
If nothing else, Trump is delivering a great season finale to his year’s long reality show.
Judge Chutkin wants it televised. I still contend that if they make it PPV, we can clear the National Debt for the next decade - even if there are Republicans in charge.I read it's still being decided if it'll be televised when trump testifies. Should be entertaining if it is.
Aren't we talking about the civil case brought by the NYS Attorney General, which is under Judge Engoron? It's my understanding that the rules prohibit transmitting audio and/or video from the courtroom, but they may be overridden if a media company applies. And, yeah, I pay to watch it streamed.Judge Chutkin wants it televised. I still contend that if they make it PPV, we can clear the National Debt for the next decade - even if there are Republicans in charge.
Honestly, there are so many cases now that I can’t be arsed to keep them straight.Aren't we talking about the civil case brought by the NYS Attorney General, which is under Judge Engoron?
Aren't we talking about the civil case brought by the NYS Attorney General, which is under Judge Engoron? It's my understanding that the rules prohibit transmitting audio and/or video from the courtroom, but they may be overridden if a media company applies. And, yeah, I pay to watch it streamed.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.