Did Walz ever say he was in a war, or did he simply refer to "weapons of war", meaning assault rifles, which is how the left often refers to them?
JD Vance is now having to defend his own military career, not because he didn't serve honorably, but because he's out there attacking Walz's career. They're also making it seem as if he got a deployment notice and went AWOL instead of retiring, and being granted a retirement. Unless I'm missing something, he wasn't called up and then bailed.
Both men served honorably in their fields. Is this the route we want to go down? I know they did it with John Kerry in 2004, but this is just plain stupid.
I don't believe the Harris/Walz campaign is criticizing JD's military service, just the pundits. I really hope this repeat of 2004 (which was actually worse) doesn't work. I hope Walz can praise Vance's military service - the only thing about him worth praising, it seems - and then defend his own record. It would be nice if neither attacked the other's service and there was no need for defense on this topic, but Vance threw the first stone. Nothing is sacred anymore, and that's not good for anyone.
*On a side note, I wonder what fans of Ashley Babbitt thought when Trump proclaimed nobody died during the J6 insurrection?