Pumbaa
Verified Warthog
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2021
- Posts
- 2,564
- Solutions
- 1
Quite generous of you to call it “attempting to stop the madness”.The last time I remember seeing him speak was on 1/6 with his absurd speech attempting to stop the madness.
Quite generous of you to call it “attempting to stop the madness”.The last time I remember seeing him speak was on 1/6 with his absurd speech attempting to stop the madness.
can you claim your running for president without legally doing so? I mean so he can take in donations but not deal with all the legal issues?
If Trump does secure their nomination for president in 2024 he will probably lose, based on recent election trends. If he doesn't get it, he will graciously accept defeat, congratulate the winner and offer to help him/her in any way he can.Trump is always going to be a problem for the GOP now because he thinks he is still The One The Only who deserves the spotlight.
Why is it that any criticism of the President draws the assumption that it must be politically motivated?
I actually don’t watch Fox. I’ve watched plenty of Biden’s speeches. No one called him “stupid” (and I would never call anyone with dementia “stupid”), but the effects of dementia do call into question things like memory and judgement.
Besides, you can’t take a single incident and draw a conclusion. It is cumulative incidents.
And even if I withhold judgement on how dementia could affect one’s ability to function in a leadership role, it’s hard to ignore the how Biden’s team limits his public interaction, leading to perhaps the least transparent president in modern times in terms of journalists being able to have Q&A with him.
Again, I haven’t seen Trump in quite some time and I don’t know specifically what you’re referring to. The last time I remember seeing him speak was on 1/6 with his absurd speech attempting to stop the madness. But if you see signs of cognitive decline in Trump then I’m not sure how you wouldn’t be able to see them in Biden.
I never saw any concerning signs of cognitive decline in Trump. What I did see were signs of narcissistic personality disorder which is incredibly toxic and brings its own concerns and problems for a leader of a country. As have been clearly demonstrated.
But this shouldn’t be an either-or discussion. It’s about what’s best for a nation. And if you ask me, neither of them should be serving in 2024 (and neither should have in the first place).
And this is also coming from a person who never said Fetterman should have been disqualified because of his stroke and subsequent cognitive processing disabilities.
Oy, where to start.
Trump bragged about a cognitive test as if he had accomplished something. Stood there for a minute in front of the world wondering aloud if you can inject disinfectant. Pushed unrpoven drugs. Lies to a remarkable degree... and not just normal political tweaking of facts, but easily disproven, bald-faced lies. He can't stay on message and yammers about himself on end. Calls everyone names and speaks in hyperbole.
I don't think Trump has cognitive decline, I think he's fucking crazy. I don't care if Biden trips up on a word or sometimes mumbles for two seconds before getting back on target.
You're focusing on cognitive impairment, of which the argument as it pertains to Biden is pure conjecture because he's 80 and stutters. I'm focused on Trump because he seems unstable, stupid and lacking any basic decency. There's no comparison.
It would definitely be interesting seeing a debate between DeSantis and say, Buttegieg. Both know their way around a podium.
I would say Buttigieg would prevail, without even breaking a sweat. With DeSatis flummoxed.
Just was wondering why Gaetz wasn't under indictment yet. Found a report dated Sept 23rd that its unlikely that charges would be brought against him. So he gets off again... Just a shame that someone like Al Franken had to resign, but that creep with some pretty gross allegations can show his face in public.Gotta love some of these Rs still trying to find their way through today's calendar options
https://www.twitter.com/i/web/status/1592580200730329088/
Oy, where to start.
Trump bragged about a cognitive test as if he had accomplished something. Stood there for a minute in front of the world wondering aloud if you can inject disinfectant. Pushed unrpoven drugs. Lies to a remarkable degree... and not just normal political tweaking of facts, but easily disproven, bald-faced lies. He can't stay on message and yammers about himself on end. Calls everyone names and speaks in hyperbole.
I don't think Trump has cognitive decline, I think he's fucking crazy. I don't care if Biden trips up on a word or sometimes mumbles for two seconds before getting back on target.
You're focusing on cognitive impairment, of which the argument as it pertains to Biden is pure conjecture because he's 80 and stutters. I'm focused on Trump because he seems unstable, stupid and lacking any basic decency. There's no comparison.
Yes, I am focusing on cognitive impairment, because that’s what I was talking about. You’re the one that brought up Trump. I was never making a comparison, you were. But I don’t disagree Trump has a dangerous personality that leads unstable behaviors. But I think I’ve already said that quite clearly. I will also make clear for the umpteenth time I never voted for him and never will.
I’m going to argue something pretty controversial here: we as American voters should not have to choose between a raging pathological narcissist criminal and someone who if living alone or with a mildly disabled spouse would probably be considered for some level of assisted living.
Much of what you describe are manifestations of narcissism. His comments about bleach or disinfectants is clearly an illiteracy around medicine/healthcare… but I believe his narcissism compelled him to A. make him talk about things he clearly did not and B. make it seem like he had solutions to problems when in fact at that point in time very little was known. And then when information contradicts his claims, he must double down on the wrong because of course, he can never be wrong. I think the redrawing of the hurricane map is the epitome of his narcissism.
My practical concern about Biden is not that he stumbles upon words or seems to frequently appear lost. It’s that dementia goes beyond that (which btw 75% of people over the age of 75 have to some degree). If a “commander in chief” is routinely or at times confused, disoriented, unable to comprehend, irrationally agitated etc that is a serious problem. In some cases you can run into problems with delusions and hallucinations. And symptoms can be affected both predictably, but also unpredictability. The fact he has so little access with Q&A and 40% days “on vacation” (yes, I realize POTUS is never really on vacation), the need for his office to routinely walk back the statement (ie US stance on Taiwan), etc concerns me that the White House is aware of problems and seeks to minimize the risk of displaying them.
It also doesn’t help on the world stage to have our President appear to have impaired facilities. And it does no service to the country when he is so inaccessible to the press from asking him questions.
And I’m not saying this to be mean or as a derisive comment towards Biden. Sure, I don’t agree with some of his politics as a independent moderate but I don’t think he is a bad person. In fact, I think he’s about as “real” as politicians get and is likely genuinely concerned for his constituents rather than himself. My comments are out of concern for the country and frankly his own well being and comfort. Dementia is a horrible, horrible, horrible disease and I wouldn’t wish it upon anyone.
His age has nothing to do with it either. Bernie Sanders and Pelosi are older and seems much more on the ball. Hell, look at Faucci. He’s 81. I thought he was at least a decade younger.
And my initial comments had nothing to do with comparing him vs. Trump or frankly any Republican candidate in any context. His state of mind should be a consideration for the democrat’s decision to primary him.
My conjecture on Biden is yes conjecture, based on observation, of which we have many datapoints to compare. And I do recognize Biden has never been the “smoothest” of public figures (often called “gaffe prone”). Just as my conjecture about Trump’s mental health and motivations are also conjecture, based on observation. I don’t expect the Biden or Trump to release comprehensive neuropsych testing. And the past decade+ working in psych medicine and dealing with countless of patients directly. Not to mention observing how dementia has affected at least a few family members.
His comments about bleach or disinfectants is clearly an illiteracy around medicine/healthcare…
You're focusing on cognitive impairment, of which the argument as it pertains to Biden is pure conjecture because he's 80 and stutters. I'm focused on Trump because he seems unstable, stupid and lacking any basic decency. There's no comparison.
He remains a drumpster, despite claims to the contrary.Biden does not need assisted living. Bringing up cognitive impairment because an 80 year old - who is actually probably sharper and more active than most his age - slips up on a word causes you to lose me on this.
Is there someone younger and even more sharp? Sure. Make the argument that he’s just too old. You don’t need all the additional fluff to make your point. Biden hasn’t shown me he’s losing control of his faculties or sanity just because he stumbles over a word.
That’s a nice way of putting it, to say the least. It was fucking stupid and all of Biden’s gaffes combined don’t add up to that audible moment of Trump’s single marble rattling around in his orange dome.
It's not the stuttering and verbal flubs.
It is when he says stuff like the US would protect Taiwan if China invades. A comment the WH walked back the next day.
At some point a comment like this at best could hurt the USA's standing in the world or at worst start a war.
And no matter how much everyone here defended him, there was NO excuse for looking for the dead Congresswoman. None!
Biden does not need assisted living. Bringing up cognitive impairment because an 80 year old - who is actually probably sharper and more active than most his age - slips up on a word causes you to lose me on this.
Is there someone younger and even more sharp? Sure. Make the argument that he’s just too old. You don’t need all the additional fluff to make your point. Biden hasn’t shown me he’s losing control of his faculties or sanity just because he stumbles over a word.
That’s a nice way of putting it, to say the least. It was fucking stupid and all of Biden’s gaffes combined don’t add up to that audible moment of Trump’s single marble rattling around in his orange dome.
someone who if living alone or with a mildly disabled spouse would probably be considered for some level of assisted living.
It’s that dementia goes beyond that (which btw 75% of people over the age of 75 have to some degree). If a “commander in chief” is routinely or at times confused, disoriented, unable to comprehend, irrationally agitated etc that is a serious problem. In some cases you can run into problems with delusions and hallucinations. And symptoms can be affected both predictably, but also unpredictability. The fact he has so little access with Q&A and 40% days “on vacation” (yes, I realize POTUS is never really on vacation), the need for his office to routinely walk back the statement (ie US stance on Taiwan), etc concerns me that the White House is aware of problems and seeks to minimize the risk of displaying them.
It also doesn’t help on the world stage to have our President appear to have impaired facilities. And it does no service to the country when he is so inaccessible to the press from asking him questions.
And I’m not saying this to be mean or as a derisive comment towards Biden.
It's not the stuttering and verbal flubs.
It is when he says stuff like the US would protect Taiwan if China invades. A comment the WH walked back the next day.
At some point a comment like this at best could hurt the USA's standing in the world or at worst start a war.
And no matter how much everyone here defended him, there was NO excuse for looking for the dead Congresswoman. None!
The prevalence of dementia decreased from 12.2 percent in 2000 to 8.5 percent in 2016 among those aged 65 and older, potentially due to increased rates of educational attainment and lower smoking rates.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.