Musk going full Nazi

[Eric]

This is actually not a privacy issue. While OTR charging, you are in a public place, with no reasonable expectation of privacy. Just like with a FF car, when you stop at a gas station, they have cameras and random witnesses, and your actions are right there out in the open.

I'm more concerned with their monitoring the inside with the cabin camera and ability to listen at any time, it's very big brother. I couldn't care less what people see from the outside.

 

[diamond.g]

I'm more concerned with their monitoring the inside with the cabin camera and ability to listen at any time, it's very big brother. I couldn't care less what people see from the outside.

I'd assume if they could do all that remotely Tesla wouldn't have had to send folks to the scene to grab the computer hardware to get that info. Right?

 

[Eric]

I'd assume if they could do all that remotely Tesla wouldn't have had to send folks to the scene to grab the computer hardware to get that info. Right?

Musk personally delivered it with no chain of custody revealed. This is a huge security concern and you can bet it won't end there, there will be an investigation and they'll all be on their toes. Imagine the outrage if Tim Cook were to personally deliver your private information over to law enforcement officials in such a secretive way, at the very least it shows impropriety.

Snip:
"I have to thank Elon Musk, specifically," said Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Sheriff Kevin McMahill to reporters.

"It reveals the kind of sweeping surveillance going on," said David Choffnes, executive director of the Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute at Northeastern University in Boston. "When something bad happens, it's helpful, but it's a double-edged sword. Companies that collect this data can abuse it."

General Motors, for instance, was sued in August by the Texas attorney general for allegedly selling data from 1.8 million drivers to insurance companies without their consent.

Cars equipped with cameras to enable self-driving features have added a new security risk. Tesla itself came under fire after Reuters reported how employees from 2019 through 2022 shared drivers' sensitive videos and recordings with each other, including videos of road rage incidents and, in one case, nudity.

Tesla did not respond to emailed questions about its privacy policy. On its website, Tesla says it follows strict rules for keeping names and information private.

 

[diamond.g]

Musk personally delivered it with no chain of custody revealed. This is a huge security concern and you can bet it won't end there, there will be an investigation and they'll all be on their toes. Imagine the outrage if Tim Cook were to personally deliver your private information over to law enforcement officials in such a secretive way, at the very least it shows impropriety.

Snip:
"I have to thank Elon Musk, specifically," said Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Sheriff Kevin McMahill to reporters.

"It reveals the kind of sweeping surveillance going on," said David Choffnes, executive director of the Cybersecurity and Privacy Institute at Northeastern University in Boston. "When something bad happens, it's helpful, but it's a double-edged sword. Companies that collect this data can abuse it."

General Motors, for instance, was sued in August by the Texas attorney general for allegedly selling data from 1.8 million drivers to insurance companies without their consent.

Cars equipped with cameras to enable self-driving features have added a new security risk. Tesla itself came under fire after Reuters reported how employees from 2019 through 2022 shared drivers' sensitive videos and recordings with each other, including videos of road rage incidents and, in one case, nudity.

Tesla did not respond to emailed questions about its privacy policy. On its website, Tesla says it follows strict rules for keeping names and information private.

I guess Tesla is doing the right thing in the wrong way. It is a double edged sword on having every Tesla basically be low-jacked. Clearly the company has been found to play fast and loose with customers data which isn't great. I guess if Musk was a "normal" CEO it would be a PR team talking about how they are cooperating with law enforcement via the proper means (I dunno if even that would be trusted though).

 

[Eric]

Wait, what?

 

[Eric]

Seriously wondering if Musk is all there.

 

[Yoused]

Three weeks? That is one darn slow traceroute.

 

[Eric]

Three weeks? That is one darn slow traceroute.

What should only take seconds takes weeks for Musk to understand, and by then he'll have fired everyone and required a complete rewrite of the tracert code.

 

[Yoused]

He ordered a complete rewrite of the code in order to work properly with IPv6 and when he ran it, it gave him an IPv4 address.

Also, I like how he just nuked his entire device. Of course, if the device was his grey matter, no one will notice anyway.

 

[rdrr]

Seriously wondering if Musk is all there.

Unless he logs in as root (a noobs way to admin a system), rm -rf will give a lot of permissions errors without sudo.

 

[Cmaier]

Unless he logs in as root (a noobs way to admin a system), rm -rf will give a lot of permissions errors without sudo.

View attachment 33445

i guarantee you he logs in as root

 

[Agent47]

He just found out what 127.0.0.1 is and thought it'd be a good idea to show the world how truly smart he is beause of that