U
User.168
Guest
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks! I’ll watch it later today…1) Russia fears Ukraine joining NATO could mean NATO forces help Ukraine retake Crimea, which gives Russia little defense in the Black Sea and causes them to lose control over oil drilling in and around the peninsula. 1b) Ukraine has cut off Crimea’s water supply, Crimea is drought-prone, and Russia intends to restore the flow from the Dnieper. 2) Ukraine has huge oil reserves in the east and west that haven’t been drilled. Ukraine could become #2 petro-state in Europe if Western oil companies help Ukraine drill that oil and gas, making Europe much less reliant on Russian oil and gas.
But I encourage anyone interested to watch it for themselves.
I don’t think it will be enough, but I hope Ukraine turns into a hell hole for Vlad.No fuel and lost behind enemy lines: How Russia's mighty army got bogged down in Ukraine — The Telegraph
Casualty numbers thought to be higher than Russia had expected with hundreds of tanks and other armoured vehicles destroyedapple.news
This is interesting to me, purely because when I was discussing the possibility of Russian invasion a few weeks ago on another forum we touched upon this subject. Cool initial attack plans are cool. Fighting a war and keeping the supply lines going is the difficult part. Some people were speculating whether Russia would have enough money and be able to support an ongoing war effort beyond a few weeks, if Ukraine didn’t immediately concede.
No fuel and lost behind enemy lines: How Russia's mighty army got bogged down in Ukraine — The Telegraph
Casualty numbers thought to be higher than Russia had expected with hundreds of tanks and other armoured vehicles destroyedapple.news
This is interesting to me, purely because when I was discussing the possibility of Russian invasion a few weeks ago on another forum we touched upon this subject. Cool initial attack plans are cool. Fighting a war and keeping the supply lines going is the difficult part. Some people were speculating whether Russia would have enough money and be able to support an ongoing war effort beyond a few weeks, if Ukraine didn’t immediately concede.
As the 20th century poet, Mike Tyson said, "everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouf."They have more than enough money (and can call on vast reserve funds).
However, the old tired but true military cliché - "no plan survives contact with te enemy" - may offer an explanation, as can arrogance, hubris, and a misguided belief that Ukrainians would welcome being "liberated" from their democracy by an invasion force, a hail of ballistic missiles, endless lies, and wave after wave of vicious and vengeful propaganda.
It does seem that Ukrainians dish it to Russia like the Finnish dished it to the USSR.For those who prefer facts to theory, I might remind readers of Russia's (well, it was the USSR at the time) disastrous (and enormously embarrassing) Winter War with Finland in the winter 1939-1940.
Putin knew that replicating the German aggression in 1939, he'll be called a nazi, so the denazification slogan just intended to dampen and distract from the 1939 analogy.Moreover, to describe the current leadership of Ukraine as neo-Nazis is not just wrong, and historically illiterate, it is risible; besides, - and this is interesting - Mr Zelensky is Jewish.
Sorry but I laughed harder at this than I should have, even scared my wife.As the 20th century poet, Mike Tyson said, "everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouf."
Sorry but I laughed harder at this than I should have, even scared my wife.
I also feel for Zelensky, they will take him out but he'll go down as a martyr and a man who stood by his people with no real help from the outside world. It's a sad way to go.
Yes.Is he still in Kiev?
Shit I lol’d tooSorry but I laughed harder at this than I should have, even scared my wife.
I also feel for Zelensky, they will take him out but he'll go down as a martyr and a man who stood by his people with no real help from the outside world. It's a sad way to go.
TBH it feels like we're all hanging him out to dry with an "atta boy". He has shown himself to be a standup courageous man, it's a shame to see it play out like this.Shit I lol’d too
Pope Francis called him to show support. Not much in the big order of things, but hopefully it will increase morale - and hope - a bit.
Yes, this is what we’re doing more or less. Evidently, We have been doing it for years, just not in plain sight.TBH it feels like we're all hanging him out to dry with an "atta boy". He has shown himself to be a standup courageous man, it's a shame to see it play out like this.
Call me cynic, but this race to send weapons to Ukraine seems a bit too late and some sort of BS aimed more at chilling domestic politics than actually help Ukraine.Certainly the Russians would be expected to try to seize border control....perhaps the helicopter (that MarkusL reported) was looking for these Russian troops that were reported. There are 4 NATO countries that border Ukraine so it'll take a lot of Russian troops to actually close the border.
Meanwhile, having previously said it wouldn't supply weapons to Ukraine, it appears the Germany has shifted its position. From The Guardian's ongoing coverage;
and Al Jazeera's coverage;
edit;
Germany to provide more military aid to Ukraine.....more from the Guardian's ongoing coverage;
and regarding SWIFT;
I do agree –to a point– with your cynical observation, but regarding the other thing, just last night, the US was offering Zelenskyy a ride to get out (implying they could still fly in and out), and Russia lost at least another helicopter and two fighter jets this afternoon, in addition to a second plane packed with paratroopers earlier. And that's in the regions they have the most control over. So while they are the ones flying around, they do not have air supremacy (yet). The weapons shipments are also believed to include AA weapons (there were pictures floating around of Avengers – basically eight Stingers slapped on a Humvee– being flown to Poland this past week) which will make it harder for the Russians to stay in the air.Call me cynic, but this race to send weapons to Ukraine seems a bit too late and some sort of BS aimed more at chilling domestic politics than actually help Ukraine.
These shipments are massive. Russia has air supremacy. There is no way that once in Ukrankan soil Russia won’t destroy most of them. Hope I am wrong.
Call me cynic, but this race to send weapons to Ukraine seems a bit too late and some sort of BS aimed more at chilling domestic politics than actually help Ukraine.
These shipments are massive. Russia has air supremacy. There is no way that once in Ukrankan soil Russia won’t destroy most of them. Hope I am wrong.
Actually, I think it is a bit more nuanced than that.Call me cynic, but this race to send weapons to Ukraine seems a bit too late and some sort of BS aimed more at chilling domestic politics than actually help Ukraine.
These shipments are massive. Russia has air supremacy. There is no way that once in Ukrankan soil Russia won’t destroy most of them. Hope I am wrong.
Yes, but.... are they not supposed to be experts working with proper intelligence and diplomatic channels? How come they don't constantly contemplate the different range of possible outcomes and draft plans, contingencies and agreements to respond to each well in advance? This has been months in the making, and it's been obvious for a while that Putin was going to invade at least part of Ukraine. Why are they still debating which sanctions to impose like it took them by surprise?Actually, I think it is a bit more nuanced than that.
Yes, outraged public opinion matters (these are democracies, after all), but I would also argue that much of the political leadership in Europe (those who who have been neither bought nor bullied by Russian interests) find themselves genuinely shocked as they had never, ever, thought that things would come to this.
Politicians always want to follow the wind of popular opinion nowadays.Yes, but.... are they not supposed to be experts working with proper intelligence and diplomatic channels? How come they don't constantly contemplate the different range of possible outcomes and draft plans, contingencies and agreements to respond to each? This has been months in the making, and it's been obvious for a while that Putin was going to invade at least part of Ukraine. Why are they still debating which sanctions to impose like it took them by surprise?
That I know, but I'm appalled by their lack of responsiveness.Politicians always want to follow the wind of popular opinion nowadays.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.