This Sunday Sweden announced it will send 5000 anti-armor rocket launchers (and body armor kits, helmets, and field rations) to Ukraine. The Parliament will vote on Monday, expected to get majority approval without drama. The opposition will likely take the opportunity to whine a bit about the government having taken too long to act, only sending
AT4 and whatever, but then vote “Yes”.
As far as I know this will be the first time since the 1939 Winter War weapons will be sent to an active war zone.
An exceptionally important point, agreed.
I don't know whether our American readers actually understand just quite how extraordinary - and transformative - all of this is to European political culture and society.
And equally extraordinary is the case of Germany, exporting arms (for the first time since 1945) to a conflict zone (one, moreover, heavy with historical resonance for Germany), and doubling their defence budget overnight.
And most extraordinary is the case of the EU.
I have worked with the EU, worked for several EU CSDP missions; the EU doesn't do armed conflict. And doesn't support, fund, or equip belligerents.
In general, the EU sends civilian "capacity-building" missions to conflict areas or war zones, generally operating under an armed umbrella supplied by someone else (NATO, the US, etc for example); the EU supports (and funds) the building of a civilian infrastructure - courts, prosecution services, police, human, civil, and women's rights, whereas people like me advise on (and report on) political matters.
But, this is unprecedented - for the EU to agree to send arms - especially at such short notice. (And, by the way, I'm in wholehearted agreement with this).