The Trump Indictment Thread

There's speculation that the DOJ was after Trump's movements around Jan 6 on his Twitter.

Donald Trump's Movements Were Tracked by Twitter—Prosecutor​

 
Trump is requesting the court let him build a secure location at Mar-a-lago to review the documents in his case.....which is admitting they weren't secure when he originally had them. :ROFLMAO:

I can see it now...

"Trump caught on tape stealing items from SCIF, taking them to New Jersey (again) and showing them off (again), on tape (again)."

I can see the Truth Social post...

"Deranged Jack Smith and the weaponized Biden DOJ are indicting me AGAIN for taking personal documents from a SCIF to my private, VERY secure home in New Jersey! I have every right to take these items from the SCIF to prepare for my trial, which everyone knows is a witch hunt the likes of which has never happened before!"
 
I can see it now...

"Trump caught on tape stealing items from SCIF, taking them to New Jersey (again) and showing them off (again), on tape (again)."

I can see the Truth Social post...

"Deranged Jack Smith and the weaponized Biden DOJ are indicting me AGAIN for taking personal documents from a SCIF to my private, VERY secure home in New Jersey! I have every right to take these items from the SCIF to prepare for my trial, which everyone knows is a witch hunt the likes of which has never happened before!"

You need to use your caps lock more to impersonate Trump on Truth Social.
 
Yup, caps implies TRUE!

And strength! Which is why Trump, in a show of strength, will not be at the primary candidates debate later this month to verbally spar with his opponents. You can’t speak and debate in all caps in real life. No, strongman Trump will debate by posting his one-sided, non-debatable mind droppings on Truth Social.

Courage and strength.
 
Since Trump and the Republican party are the top purveyors of projection I came to the realization that Trump sure likes using the words deranged and racist a lot. I agree with his projection confession.
 
They can’t prove he really believed it, simply because the rules of evidence won’t permit them to do so.

1) Trump won’t testify on his own behalf
2) Nobody else is allowed to testify about his state of mind
3) Nobody else can testify about what he said, because anything he said is, if offered by his defense, hearsay.

On the other hand, the prosecution can offer people who testify about things he said (or enter his written or recorded words into evidence), if they want (an exception to hearsay), and can testify about what everyone told him.

He’s cooked.
What do you think are the chances of an early 2024 trial, which is what Jack Smith is pushing for?
 
What do you think are the chances of an early 2024 trial, which is what Jack Smith is pushing for?

I figure Q1 is where the judge will land. Maybe February or March. The NY trial will move if need be.
 
Anyone seen this? He is rumored to be Co-conspirator 6… That would make two co-conspirators accused of sexual assault, and three if you count the ringleader who’s been found accusations of rape - oh, excuse me, sexual assault - to be valid.

It goes on and on and on. This is the guy Trump voluntarily chooses to have around him.

 
Anyone seen this? He is rumored to be Co-conspirator 6… That would make two co-conspirators accused of sexual assault, and three if you count the ringleader who’s been found accusations of rape - oh, excuse me, sexual assault - to be valid.

It goes on and on and on. This is the guy Trump voluntarily chooses to have around him.

trump had something like 6 pedos in his administration or working under him. he seems to collect perverts being one himself.
 
One can only hope.

I think it works something like this,

But, the speed limit on that road is 60
The speed limit on that road varies between 20 (where the school is) and 50; on the stretch where you were pulled over, it is 35
But, the speed limit is 60
You were pulled over for doing 67 in a 35
I am sure the speed limit is 60 there
and no amount of gainsaying on your part will change that

In other words, if you do a thing intentionally, which turns out to be illegal, it ultimately does not matter whether or not you believed the thing you were doing was legal or that you had a right to do it. You broke the law with intent, and you can be prosecuted for that, end of story.
 
Last edited:
I think it works something like this,

But, the speed limit on that road is 60
The speed limit on that road varies between 20 (where the school is) and 50; on the stretch where you were pulled over, it is 35
But, the speed limit is 60
You were pulled over for doing 67 in a 35
I am sure the speed limit is 60 there
and no amount of gainsaying on your part will change that

In other words, if you do a thing intentionally, which turns out to be illegal, it ultimately does not matter whether or not you believed the thing you were doing was legal or that you had a right to do it. You broke the law with intent, and you can be prosecuted for that, end of story.
The first part of your post reminds me of Monty Python’s argument sketch:

Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of any statement the other person makes.

No it isn't.

It is.

Not at all.
 
Trump is requesting the court let him build a secure location at Mar-a-lago to review the documents in his case.....which is admitting they weren't secure when he originally had them. :ROFLMAO:

Also... Hah, good luck with that. A nice delaying tactic to avoid facing justice before the election. It takes at least a year to plan, get approval, build, and certify a SCIF.

I'm sure there's a military base or other government secure facility nearby that could be temporarily used. Problem solved.
 
Anyone seen this? He is rumored to be Co-conspirator 6… That would make two co-conspirators accused of sexual assault, and three if you count the ringleader who’s been found accusations of rape - oh, excuse me, sexual assault - to be valid.
And Trump recently alleged that the Georgia prosecutor had an affair with a gang member (who she was defending, not prosecuting). It's so hypocritical and says a lot about his gullible base of deplorables that he would even bring this up, given that he cheated on all three of his wives, paid hush money to a porn star and bragged about groping women.
 
Also... Hah, good luck with that. A nice delaying tactic to avoid facing justice before the election. It takes at least a year to plan, get approval, build, and certify a SCIF.

I'm sure there's a military base or other government secure facility nearby that could be temporarily used. Problem solved.


Perhaps they can build one in the nearest prison so he can get accumulated to his future lifestyle.
 
This is silly, but I just had a vision of Trump being forced to attend the next inauguration for Biden in a glass cage like Magneto. I’m starting to get overconfident, need to settle down.
 
Back
Top