i have no idea just saw the reddit post in my suggestions.Interesting, did he actually buy it?
in this case, the courts would likely apply the “likelihood of confusion” test. Would an ordinary consumer be likely to be confused as to the source of the product? It seems like a pretty good case for xorg, if they wanted to go for it.I was just about post this to specifically ask you about it from the position of a lawyer (I think we have a couple of others on here with legal training too?). As a non-lawyer it certainly looks infringing.
He’s just switched the arms back to front:
In black and white:
Also they don’t use it anymore but these are the Xerox logos over time:
X.com redirects to twitter.com for me. The change may still be propagating through the DNS system.Are we supposed to call it X now?? Because the url is still twitter.com. I tried x.com today and it's just "parked" by GoDaddy.
I'm really confused by this whole thing.
I quit using it a long time ago so I haven't even bothered to look or open the app, from time to time I'll chase a link there in my browser but that's just the Twitter URL.Are we supposed to call it X now?? Because the url is still twitter.com. I tried x.com today and it's just "parked" by GoDaddy.
I'm really confused by this whole thing.
not on my phone or my computer, but good point about taking awhile to populate.X.com redirects to twitter.com for me. The change may still be propagating through the DNS system.
DNS usually propagates around the world within minutes but can take up to an hour, could be that it's so big that it may take longer though. It's common that it works for some but not for others until it's complete.not on my phone or my computer, but good point about taking awhile to populate.
here’s another reddit find. of course you never know how true these are.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.