- Joined
- Aug 15, 2020
- Posts
- 8,240
Okay, moved to News so we can discuss as a political topic again. Carry on.
Thanks!
Okay, moved to News so we can discuss as a political topic again. Carry on.
An appropriate move. Musk himself appears to have taken his tech enterprises into politics. Where he leads, we follow
Precisely why it's now impossible to talk about Musk or his associated ventures without being political.
He himself is outwardly making very political statements
I wonder if those same folk that don't want a Tesla because of Musk would be willing to forgo using the Supercharger network that is opening to non-Tesla's as well.With growing EV competition I can't see this helping Telsa sales. They are no longer shiny and exciting and his politics is just another potential reason to look elsewhere. In fact it might be the only reason some look into alternatives they wouldn't have considered before.
I’m pretty sure that if you bought a different car specifically because you don’t want to line Musk’s pocket, the minor inconvenience of using another charger instead of a supercharger would not be a big deal. There are lots of other chargers out there. And from what I’ve seen, the experience and price of using a supercharger as a non-Tesla owner aren’t all that compelling.I wonder if those same folk that don't want a Tesla because of Musk would be willing to forgo using the Supercharger network that is opening to non-Tesla's as well.
I wonder if those same folk that don't want a Tesla because of Musk would be willing to forgo using the Supercharger network that is opening to non-Tesla's as well.
I’m pretty sure that if you bought a different car specifically because you don’t want to line Musk’s pocket, the minor inconvenience of using another charger instead of a supercharger would not be a big deal. There are lots of other chargers out there. And from what I’ve seen, the experience and price of using a supercharger as a non-Tesla owner aren’t all that compelling.
I might be confused here (probably am), but I thought we were talking about charging your car at public ports. If this is a matter of something you would install at your house or something, then yeah, I could see people not doing that over political differences.
Sure it is. Everyone who currently owns a non-Tesla electric car has gone another block to charge up this whole time. Because it wasn’t until yesterday that they even had the option to use Tesla’s charging stations.I doubt most would go that far. Needing to charge your car is a necessity unlike choosing to buy a Tesla and currently I wouldn’t say it's exactly a wide-open free market of convenient charging options. It’s not like he’s running a gas station franchise where you can just go another block to gas up if you don’t agree with his politics.
To be fair, CA is like the golden Mecca of charging options on every corner. The rest of the country isn't so lucky...Yes, these are public ports operated by Tesla. So why would you charge your non-Tesla at a Tesla supercharger when you purposely avoided buying a Tesla to avoid helping Musk? If I bought a Ford or Kia instead of a Tesla because I didn’t want to give Elon my $$, I’d certainly also use non-Tesla public chargers, since there are so many around and it’s not even a hassle to avoid Tesla chargers. I mean, it wasn’t until yesterday that you COULD charge a non-Tesla at a Tesla supercharger (in the USA), and even now it’s only at a handful of charging stations.
Sure, but people who own non-Teslas up until today have been getting along without using Tesla chargers - it’s still not an option almost anywhere. Why would they suddenly start (particularly if they already made a conscious decision to avoid Musk)?To be fair, CA is like the golden Mecca of charging options on every corner. The rest of the country isn't so lucky...
I think the argument is, (once the network is 100% available) folks will have more options to go places where CCS hasn't quite shown up yet (say like the outer banks). Heck my wife would like a EV truck but our trip from Va Beach to Wilmington is waaaaay easier with the Supercharger options available than with the CCS ones (last I checked).Sure, but people who own non-Teslas up until today have been getting along without using Tesla chargers - it’s still not an option almost anywhere. Why would they suddenly start (particularly if they already made a conscious decision to avoid Musk)?
Yes, these are public ports operated by Tesla. So why would you charge your non-Tesla at a Tesla supercharger when you purposely avoided buying a Tesla to avoid helping Musk? If I bought a Ford or Kia instead of a Tesla because I didn’t want to give Elon my $$, I’d certainly also use non-Tesla public chargers, since there are so many around and it’s not even a hassle to avoid Tesla chargers. I mean, it wasn’t until yesterday that you COULD charge a non-Tesla at a Tesla supercharger (in the USA), and even now it’s only at a handful of charging stations.
I’m pretty sure that if you bought a different car specifically because you don’t want to line Musk’s pocket, the minor inconvenience of using another charger instead of a supercharger would not be a big deal. There are lots of other chargers out there. And from what I’ve seen, the experience and price of using a supercharger as a non-Tesla owner aren’t all that compelling.
He was for it before he was against it. From 2018, if he made that tweet today Fox News and Republicans would disown him.An appropriate move. Musk himself appears to have taken his tech enterprises into politics. Where he leads, we follow
He was for it before he was against it. From 2018, if he made that tweet today Fox News and Republicans would disown him.
I don’t have a “News” tab. Must be going really bad.The "News" tab gives us a sense of how it's going over at Twitter
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.